Amin Sarihi

Amin Sarihi, Ahmad Patooghy, Peter Jamieson et al.

This paper utilizes Reinforcement Learning (RL) as a means to automate the Hardware Trojan (HT) insertion process to eliminate the inherent human biases that limit the development of robust HT detection methods. An RL agent explores the design space and finds circuit locations that are best for keeping inserted HTs hidden. To achieve this, a digital circuit is converted to an environment in which an RL agent inserts HTs such that the cumulative reward is maximized. Our toolset can insert combinational HTs into the ISCAS-85 benchmark suite with variations in HT size and triggering conditions. Experimental results show that the toolset achieves high input coverage rates (100\% in two benchmark circuits) that confirms its effectiveness. Also, the inserted HTs have shown a minimal footprint and rare activation probability.

Amin Sarihi, Peter Jamieson, Ahmad Patooghy et al.

Hardware Trojans (HTs) are undesired design or manufacturing modifications that can severely alter the security and functionality of digital integrated circuits. HTs can be inserted according to various design criteria, e.g., nets switching activity, observability, controllability, etc. However, to our knowledge, most HT detection methods are only based on a single criterion, i.e., nets switching activity. This paper proposes a multi-criteria reinforcement learning (RL) HT detection tool that features a tunable reward function for different HT detection scenarios. The tool allows for exploring existing detection strategies and can adapt new detection scenarios with minimal effort. We also propose a generic methodology for comparing HT detection methods fairly. Our preliminary results show an average of 84.2% successful HT detection in ISCAS-85 benchmark

Amin Sarihi, Ahmad Patooghy, Abdel-Hameed A. Badawy et al.

This work focuses on advancing security research in the hardware design space by formally defining the realistic problem of Hardware Trojan (HT) detection. The goal is to model HT detection more closely to the real world, i.e., describing the problem as "The Seeker's Dilemma" (an extension of Hide&Seek on a graph), where a detecting agent is unaware of whether circuits are infected by HTs or not. Using this theoretical problem formulation, we create a benchmark that consists of a mixture of HT-free and HT-infected restructured circuits while preserving their original functionalities. The restructured circuits are randomly infected by HTs, causing a situation where the defender is uncertain if a circuit is infected or not. We believe that our innovative dataset will help the community better judge the detection quality of different methods by comparing their success rates in circuit classification. We use our developed benchmark to evaluate three state-of-the-art HT detection tools to show baseline results for this approach. We use Principal Component Analysis to assess the strength of our benchmark, where we observe that some restructured HT-infected circuits are mapped closely to HT-free circuits, leading to significant label misclassification by detectors.

Amin Sarihi, Ahmad Patooghy, Peter Jamieson et al.

This work focuses on advancing security research in the hardware design space by formally defining the realistic problem of Hardware Trojan (HT) detection. The goal is to model HT detection more closely to the real world, i.e., describing the problem as The Seeker's Dilemma where a detecting agent is unaware of whether circuits are infected by HTs or not. Using this theoretical problem formulation, we create a benchmark that consists of a mixture of HT-free and HT-infected restructured circuits while preserving their original functionalities. The restructured circuits are randomly infected by HTs, causing a situation where the defender is uncertain if a circuit is infected or not. We believe that our innovative benchmark and methodology of creating benchmarks will help the community judge the detection quality of different methods by comparing their success rates in circuit classification. We use our developed benchmark to evaluate three state-of-the-art HT detection tools to show baseline results for this approach. We use Principal Component Analysis to assess the strength of our benchmark, where we observe that some restructured HT-infected circuits are mapped closely to HT-free circuits, leading to significant label misclassification by detectors.