Hoa N. Nguyen

Christoph Leiter, Hoa Nguyen, Steffen Eger

State-of-the-art natural language generation evaluation metrics are based on black-box language models. Hence, recent works consider their explainability with the goals of better understandability for humans and better metric analysis, including failure cases. In contrast, our proposed method BMX: Boosting Natural Language Generation Metrics with explainability explicitly leverages explanations to boost the metrics' performance. In particular, we perceive feature importance explanations as word-level scores, which we convert, via power means, into a segment-level score. We then combine this segment-level score with the original metric to obtain a better metric. Our tests show improvements for multiple metrics across MT and summarization datasets. While improvements in machine translation are small, they are strong for summarization. Notably, BMX with the LIME explainer and preselected parameters achieves an average improvement of 0.087 points in Spearman correlation on the system-level evaluation of SummEval.

Nigel Bernard, Hoa Nguyen, Aman Chandan et al.

With the growing complexity of big data workloads that require abundant data and computation, data centers consume a tremendous amount of power daily. In an effort to minimize data center power consumption, several studies developed power models that can be used for job scheduling either reducing the number of active servers or balancing workloads across servers at their peak energy efficiency points. Due to increasing software and hardware heterogeneity, we observed that there is no single power model that works the best for all server conditions. Some complicated machine learning models themselves incur performance and power overheads and hence it is not desirable to use them frequently. There are no power models that consider containerized workload execution. In this paper, we propose a hybrid server power model, Hydra, that considers both prediction accuracy and performance overhead. Hydra dynamically chooses the best power model for the given server conditions. Compared with state-of-the-art solutions, Hydra outperforms across all compute-intensity levels on heterogeneous servers.

Hoa Nguyen, Steffen Eger

Citations are a key ingredient of scientific research to relate a paper to others published in the community. Recently, it has been noted that there is a citation age bias in the Natural Language Processing (NLP) community, one of the currently fastest growing AI subfields, in that the mean age of the bibliography of NLP papers has become ever younger in the last few years, leading to `citation amnesia' in which older knowledge is increasingly forgotten. In this work, we put such claims into perspective by analyzing the bibliography of $\sim$300k papers across 15 different scientific fields submitted to the popular preprint server Arxiv in the time period from 2013 to 2022. We find that all AI subfields (in particular: cs.AI, cs.CL, cs.CV, cs.LG) have similar trends of citation amnesia, in which the age of the bibliography has roughly halved in the last 10 years (from above 12 in 2013 to below 7 in 2022), on average. Rather than diagnosing this as a citation age bias in the NLP community, we believe this pattern is an artefact of the dynamics of these research fields, in which new knowledge is produced in ever shorter time intervals.