7.0IVJun 18
LLM-Driven Heuristic Frame-Level Quantization Parameter Adaptation for VVenCLiqiang He, Yingwen Zhang, Riyu Lu et al.
Optimal frame-level quantization parameter (QP) allocation remains a persistent challenge in modern video encoders. The fixed-QP scheme widely adopted in practical systems is inherently content-agnostic, while classical Lagrangian rate-distortion optimization (RDO) methods often suffer from inaccurate multiplier settings. In this paper, we explore the use of large language models (LLMs) to automatically design RDO heuristics for frame-level QP adaptation. We construct a closed-loop evolutionary framework in which the LLM iteratively proposes RDO heuristics as algorithmic ideas with executable code, and these candidates are evaluated directly through encoding with the Fraunhofer Versatile Video Encoder (VVenC), where each heuristic acts as a scoring function that compares different QP choices based on the encoding statistics of past frames and current candidates. Experimental results across multiple test sets show that the evolved heuristic achieves promising rate-distortion improvements over both the fixed-QP scheme and the Lagrangian baseline. Further analysis reveals that the LLM can autonomously discover an adaptive heuristic that penalizes QP fluctuations via entropy-based terms, providing new insights into the design of RDO algorithms
4.9CLFeb 18, 2025
Reasoning and the Trusting Behavior of DeepSeek and GPT: An Experiment Revealing Hidden Fault Lines in Large Language ModelsRubing Li, João Sedoc, Arun Sundararajan
When encountering increasingly frequent performance improvements or cost reductions from a new large language model (LLM), developers of applications leveraging LLMs must decide whether to take advantage of these improvements or stay with older tried-and-tested models. Low perceived switching frictions can lead to choices that do not consider more subtle behavior changes that the transition may induce. Our experiments use a popular game-theoretic behavioral economics model of trust to show stark differences in the trusting behavior of OpenAI's and DeepSeek's models. We highlight a collapse in the economic trust behavior of the o1-mini and o3-mini models as they reconcile profit-maximizing and risk-seeking with future returns from trust, and contrast it with DeepSeek's more sophisticated and profitable trusting behavior that stems from an ability to incorporate deeper concepts like forward planning and theory-of-mind. As LLMs form the basis for high-stakes commercial systems, our results highlight the perils of relying on LLM performance benchmarks that are too narrowly defined and suggest that careful analysis of their hidden fault lines should be part of any organization's AI strategy.