Tao Zhang

Huiqiang Chen, Tianqing Zhu, Tao Zhang et al.

Federated learning (FL) has been a hot topic in recent years. Ever since it was introduced, researchers have endeavored to devise FL systems that protect privacy or ensure fair results, with most research focusing on one or the other. As two crucial ethical notions, the interactions between privacy and fairness are comparatively less studied. However, since privacy and fairness compete, considering each in isolation will inevitably come at the cost of the other. To provide a broad view of these two critical topics, we presented a detailed literature review of privacy and fairness issues, highlighting unique challenges posed by FL and solutions in federated settings. We further systematically surveyed different interactions between privacy and fairness, trying to reveal how privacy and fairness could affect each other and point out new research directions in fair and private FL.

Huili Chen, Jie Ding, Eric Tramel et al.

In the context of personalized federated learning (FL), the critical challenge is to balance local model improvement and global model tuning when the personal and global objectives may not be exactly aligned. Inspired by Bayesian hierarchical models, we develop a self-aware personalized FL method where each client can automatically balance the training of its local personal model and the global model that implicitly contributes to other clients' training. Such a balance is derived from the inter-client and intra-client uncertainty quantification. A larger inter-client variation implies more personalization is needed. Correspondingly, our method uses uncertainty-driven local training steps and aggregation rule instead of conventional local fine-tuning and sample size-based aggregation. With experimental studies on synthetic data, Amazon Alexa audio data, and public datasets such as MNIST, FEMNIST, CIFAR10, and Sent140, we show that our proposed method can achieve significantly improved personalization performance compared with the existing counterparts.

Van Sy Mai, Richard J. La, Tao Zhang

Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a means of distributed learning using local data stored at clients with a coordinating server. Recent studies showed that FL can suffer from poor performance and slower convergence when training data at clients are not independent and identically distributed. Here we consider a new complementary approach to mitigating this performance degradation by allowing the server to perform auxiliary learning from a small dataset. Our analysis and experiments show that this new approach can achieve significant improvements in both model accuracy and convergence time even when the server dataset is small and its distribution differs from that of the aggregated data from all clients.

Jie Ding, Eric Tramel, Anit Kumar Sahu et al.

Federated learning (FL) has been developed as a promising framework to leverage the resources of edge devices, enhance customers' privacy, comply with regulations, and reduce development costs. Although many methods and applications have been developed for FL, several critical challenges for practical FL systems remain unaddressed. This paper provides an outlook on FL development, categorized into five emerging directions of FL, namely algorithm foundation, personalization, hardware and security constraints, lifelong learning, and nonstandard data. Our unique perspectives are backed by practical observations from large-scale federated systems for edge devices.

Xutong Mu, Yulong Shen, Ke Cheng et al.

Federated learning allows multiple clients to collaborate to train high-performance deep learning models while keeping the training data locally. However, when the local data of all clients are not independent and identically distributed (i.e., non-IID), it is challenging to implement this form of efficient collaborative learning. Although significant efforts have been dedicated to addressing this challenge, the effect on the image classification task is still not satisfactory. In this paper, we propose FedProc: prototypical contrastive federated learning, which is a simple and effective federated learning framework. The key idea is to utilize the prototypes as global knowledge to correct the local training of each client. We design a local network architecture and a global prototypical contrastive loss to regulate the training of local models, which makes local objectives consistent with the global optima. Eventually, the converged global model obtains a good performance on non-IID data. Experimental results show that, compared to state-of-the-art federated learning methods, FedProc improves the accuracy by $1.6\%\sim7.9\%$ with acceptable computation cost.

Tao Zhang, Tianqing Zhu, Ping Xiong et al.

Privacy preserving in machine learning is a crucial issue in industry informatics since data used for training in industries usually contain sensitive information. Existing differentially private machine learning algorithms have not considered the impact of data correlation, which may lead to more privacy leakage than expected in industrial applications. For example, data collected for traffic monitoring may contain some correlated records due to temporal correlation or user correlation. To fill this gap, we propose a correlation reduction scheme with differentially private feature selection considering the issue of privacy loss when data have correlation in machine learning tasks. %The key to the proposed scheme is to describe the data correlation and select features which leads to less data correlation across the whole dataset. The proposed scheme involves five steps with the goal of managing the extent of data correlation, preserving the privacy, and supporting accuracy in the prediction results. In this way, the impact of data correlation is relieved with the proposed feature selection scheme, and moreover, the privacy issue of data correlation in learning is guaranteed. The proposed method can be widely used in machine learning algorithms which provide services in industrial areas. Experiments show that the proposed scheme can produce better prediction results with machine learning tasks and fewer mean square errors for data queries compared to existing schemes.

Tao Zhang, Tianqing Zhu, Mengde Han et al.

Fairness in machine learning has received considerable attention. However, most studies on fair learning focus on either supervised learning or unsupervised learning. Very few consider semi-supervised settings. Yet, in reality, most machine learning tasks rely on large datasets that contain both labeled and unlabeled data. One of key issues with fair learning is the balance between fairness and accuracy. Previous studies arguing that increasing the size of the training set can have a better trade-off. We believe that increasing the training set with unlabeled data may achieve the similar result. Hence, we develop a framework for fair semi-supervised learning, which is formulated as an optimization problem. This includes classifier loss to optimize accuracy, label propagation loss to optimize unlabled data prediction, and fairness constraints over labeled and unlabeled data to optimize the fairness level. The framework is conducted in logistic regression and support vector machines under the fairness metrics of disparate impact and disparate mistreatment. We theoretically analyze the source of discrimination in semi-supervised learning via bias, variance and noise decomposition. Extensive experiments show that our method is able to achieve fair semi-supervised learning, and reach a better trade-off between accuracy and fairness than fair supervised learning.

Tao Zhang, Tianqing Zhu, Renping Liu et al.

Differential privacy is a rigorous mathematical framework for evaluating and protecting data privacy. In most existing studies, there is a vulnerable assumption that records in a dataset are independent when differential privacy is applied. However, in real-world datasets, records are likely to be correlated, which may lead to unexpected data leakage. In this survey, we investigate the issue of privacy loss due to data correlation under differential privacy models. Roughly, we classify existing literature into three lines: 1) using parameters to describe data correlation in differential privacy, 2) using models to describe data correlation in differential privacy, and 3) describing data correlation based on the framework of Pufferfish. Firstly, a detailed example is given to illustrate the issue of privacy leakage on correlated data in real scenes. Then our main work is to analyze and compare these methods, and evaluate situations that these diverse studies are applied. Finally, we propose some future challenges on correlated differential privacy.