Zifan Zhang

Zhao Tian, Zifan Zhang, Tao Xiao et al.

Recent advances in coding agents have shown remarkable progress in software issue resolution. In practice, real-world issues are typically bug fixes or feature requests in which human developers naturally incorporate refactoring as part of the resolution process, resulting in tangled refactoring. Since LLMs are trained on large-scale open-source repositories, coding agents may inherit such behaviors. In this paper, we conduct an empirical study on Multi-SWE-bench, analyzing 3,691 valid patches generated by three agent frameworks with 12 LLMs. We find that coding agents introduce tangled refactorings less frequently (21.43% vs. 36.72%) and with lower intensity (0.66 vs. 1.75) than human developers, although they exhibit a broader diversity of refactoring types. Logistic regression analysis further shows that tangled refactorings are strongly associated with reduced compilability, while exhibiting no significant association with functional correctness. Based on these findings, we propose a refactoring-aware refinement approach that assesses the necessity and safety of tangled refactorings and selectively removes or repairs problematic operations. Our approach improves compilability from 19.34% to 38.33%, and additionally resolves 2.79% previously unresolved issues. Overall, this work presents the first step towards understanding tangled refactoring practices in agentic issue resolution and opens up avenues for future work.

Hairi, Minghong Fang, Zifan Zhang et al.

In this paper, we study a fully-decentralized multi-agent policy evaluation problem, which is an important sub-problem in cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning, in the presence of up to $f$ faulty agents. In particular, we focus on the so-called Byzantine faulty model with model poisoning setting. In general, policy evaluation is to evaluate the value function of any given policy. In cooperative multi-agent system, the system-wide rewards are usually modeled as the uniform average of rewards from all agents. We investigate the multi-agent policy evaluation problem in the presence of Byzantine agents, particularly in the setting of heterogeneous local rewards. Ideally, the goal of the agents is to evaluate the accumulated system-wide rewards, which are uniform average of rewards of the normal agents for a given policy. It means that all agents agree upon common values (the consensus part) and furthermore, the consensus values are the value functions (the convergence part). However, we prove that this goal is not achievable. Instead, we consider a relaxed version of the problem, where the goal of the agents is to evaluate accumulated system-wide reward, which is an appropriately weighted average reward of the normal agents. We further prove that there is no correct algorithm that can guarantee that the total number of positive weights exceeds $|\mathcal{N}|-f $, where $|\mathcal{N}|$ is the number of normal agents. Towards the end, we propose a Byzantine-tolerant decentralized temporal difference algorithm that can guarantee asymptotic consensus under scalar function approximation. We then empirically test the effective of the proposed algorithm.

Zifan Zhang, Minghong Fang, Jiayuan Huang et al.

Federated Learning (FL) offers a distributed framework to train a global control model across multiple base stations without compromising the privacy of their local network data. This makes it ideal for applications like wireless traffic prediction (WTP), which plays a crucial role in optimizing network resources, enabling proactive traffic flow management, and enhancing the reliability of downstream communication-aided applications, such as IoT devices, autonomous vehicles, and industrial automation systems. Despite its promise, the security aspects of FL-based distributed wireless systems, particularly in regression-based WTP problems, remain inadequately investigated. In this paper, we introduce a novel fake traffic injection (FTI) attack, designed to undermine the FL-based WTP system by injecting fabricated traffic distributions with minimal knowledge. We further propose a defense mechanism, termed global-local inconsistency detection (GLID), which strategically removes abnormal model parameters that deviate beyond a specific percentile range estimated through statistical methods in each dimension. Extensive experimental evaluations, performed on real-world wireless traffic datasets, demonstrate that both our attack and defense strategies significantly outperform existing baselines.

Shaobo Wang, Zhengbo Jiao, Zifan Zhang et al.

Recent breakthroughs in large language models (LLMs) on reasoning tasks rely heavily on massive, high-quality datasets-typically human-annotated and thus difficult to scale. While data synthesis or distillation offers a promising alternative, existing methods struggle with inconsistent data quality and an inability to dynamically adapt to the evolving capabilities of the model, leading to suboptimal training signals. To address these limitations, we introduce Socratic-Zero, a fully autonomous framework that generates high-quality training data from minimal seed examples through the co-evolution of three agents: the Teacher, the Solver, and the Generator. The Solver continuously refines its reasoning by learning from preference feedback on both successful and failed trajectories; the Teacher adaptively crafts increasingly challenging questions based on the Solver's weaknesses; and the Generator distills the Teacher's question-design strategy to enable scalable, high-fidelity curriculum generation. This closed-loop system produces a self-improving curriculum-requiring no pre-existing tasks or labels. Remarkably, starting from only 100 seed questions, our Socratic-Solver-8B achieves an average gain of +20.2 percentage points over prior data synthesis methods across seven mathematical reasoning benchmarks (AMC23, AIME24-25, Olympiad, MATH-500, Minerva, and GSM8K), with consistent gains on both Qwen3 and GLM4 series models. Even more surprisingly, synthetic data from Socratic-Generator-32B enables student LLMs to achieve superior performance compared to other state-of-the-art (SOTA) commercial LLMs on these benchmarks, including Qwen3-235B-A22B, DeepSeek-V3.1-671B, GPT-5, Gemini-2.5-Pro, Grok-4, and Claude-4.1-Opus.

Wenbin Wang, Qiwen Ma, Zifan Zhang et al.

Federated learning allows multiple clients to collaboratively train a global model with the assistance of a server. However, its distributed nature makes it susceptible to poisoning attacks, where malicious clients can compromise the global model by sending harmful local model updates to the server. To unlearn an accurate global model from a poisoned one after identifying malicious clients, federated unlearning has been introduced. Yet, current research on federated unlearning has primarily concentrated on its effectiveness and efficiency, overlooking the security challenges it presents. In this work, we bridge the gap via proposing BadUnlearn, the first poisoning attacks targeting federated unlearning. In BadUnlearn, malicious clients send specifically designed local model updates to the server during the unlearning process, aiming to ensure that the resulting unlearned model remains poisoned. To mitigate these threats, we propose UnlearnGuard, a robust federated unlearning framework that is provably robust against both existing poisoning attacks and our BadUnlearn. The core concept of UnlearnGuard is for the server to estimate the clients' local model updates during the unlearning process and employ a filtering strategy to verify the accuracy of these estimations. Theoretically, we prove that the model unlearned through UnlearnGuard closely resembles one obtained by train-from-scratch. Empirically, we show that BadUnlearn can effectively corrupt existing federated unlearning methods, while UnlearnGuard remains secure against poisoning attacks.

Minghong Fang, Zifan Zhang, Hairi et al.

Federated learning (FL) enables multiple clients to collaboratively train machine learning models without revealing their private training data. In conventional FL, the system follows the server-assisted architecture (server-assisted FL), where the training process is coordinated by a central server. However, the server-assisted FL framework suffers from poor scalability due to a communication bottleneck at the server, and trust dependency issues. To address challenges, decentralized federated learning (DFL) architecture has been proposed to allow clients to train models collaboratively in a serverless and peer-to-peer manner. However, due to its fully decentralized nature, DFL is highly vulnerable to poisoning attacks, where malicious clients could manipulate the system by sending carefully-crafted local models to their neighboring clients. To date, only a limited number of Byzantine-robust DFL methods have been proposed, most of which are either communication-inefficient or remain vulnerable to advanced poisoning attacks. In this paper, we propose a new algorithm called BALANCE (Byzantine-robust averaging through local similarity in decentralization) to defend against poisoning attacks in DFL. In BALANCE, each client leverages its own local model as a similarity reference to determine if the received model is malicious or benign. We establish the theoretical convergence guarantee for BALANCE under poisoning attacks in both strongly convex and non-convex settings. Furthermore, the convergence rate of BALANCE under poisoning attacks matches those of the state-of-the-art counterparts in Byzantine-free settings. Extensive experiments also demonstrate that BALANCE outperforms existing DFL methods and effectively defends against poisoning attacks.