Mark Horton

h-index8
2papers
1,390citations

2 Papers

6.4LGAug 19, 2024
Criticality Leveraged Adversarial Training (CLAT) for Boosted Performance via Parameter Efficiency

Bhavna Gopal, Huanrui Yang, Jingyang Zhang et al.

Adversarial training enhances neural network robustness but suffers from a tendency to overfit and increased generalization errors on clean data. This work introduces CLAT, an innovative approach that mitigates adversarial overfitting by introducing parameter efficiency into the adversarial training process, improving both clean accuracy and adversarial robustness. Instead of tuning the entire model, CLAT identifies and fine-tunes robustness-critical layers - those predominantly learning non-robust features - while freezing the remaining model to enhance robustness. It employs dynamic critical layer selection to adapt to changes in layer criticality throughout the fine-tuning process. Empirically, CLAT can be applied on top of existing adversarial training methods, significantly reduces the number of trainable parameters by approximately 95%, and achieves more than a 2% improvement in adversarial robustness compared to baseline methods.

13.1CVJan 2, 2025
SAFER: Sharpness Aware layer-selective Finetuning for Enhanced Robustness in vision transformers

Bhavna Gopal, Huanrui Yang, Mark Horton et al.

Vision transformers (ViTs) have become essential backbones in advanced computer vision applications and multi-modal foundation models. Despite their strengths, ViTs remain vulnerable to adversarial perturbations, comparable to or even exceeding the vulnerability of convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Furthermore, the large parameter count and complex architecture of ViTs make them particularly prone to adversarial overfitting, often compromising both clean and adversarial accuracy. This paper mitigates adversarial overfitting in ViTs through a novel, layer-selective fine-tuning approach: SAFER. Instead of optimizing the entire model, we identify and selectively fine-tune a small subset of layers most susceptible to overfitting, applying sharpness-aware minimization to these layers while freezing the rest of the model. Our method consistently enhances both clean and adversarial accuracy over baseline approaches. Typical improvements are around 5%, with some cases achieving gains as high as 20% across various ViT architectures and datasets.