6.8CVJun 1, 2023
Discriminative Deep Feature Visualization for Explainable Face RecognitionZewei Xu, Yuhang Lu, Touradj Ebrahimi
Despite the huge success of deep convolutional neural networks in face recognition (FR) tasks, current methods lack explainability for their predictions because of their "black-box" nature. In recent years, studies have been carried out to give an interpretation of the decision of a deep FR system. However, the affinity between the input facial image and the extracted deep features has not been explored. This paper contributes to the problem of explainable face recognition by first conceiving a face reconstruction-based explanation module, which reveals the correspondence between the deep feature and the facial regions. To further interpret the decision of an FR model, a novel visual saliency explanation algorithm has been proposed. It provides insightful explanation by producing visual saliency maps that represent similar and dissimilar regions between input faces. A detailed analysis has been presented for the generated visual explanation to show the effectiveness of the proposed method.
8.7CVMar 7, 2024
Explainable Face Verification via Feature-Guided Gradient BackpropagationYuhang Lu, Zewei Xu, Touradj Ebrahimi
Recent years have witnessed significant advancement in face recognition (FR) techniques, with their applications widely spread in people's lives and security-sensitive areas. There is a growing need for reliable interpretations of decisions of such systems. Existing studies relying on various mechanisms have investigated the usage of saliency maps as an explanation approach, but suffer from different limitations. This paper first explores the spatial relationship between face image and its deep representation via gradient backpropagation. Then a new explanation approach FGGB has been conceived, which provides precise and insightful similarity and dissimilarity saliency maps to explain the "Accept" and "Reject" decision of an FR system. Extensive visual presentation and quantitative measurement have shown that FGGB achieves superior performance in both similarity and dissimilarity maps when compared to current state-of-the-art explainable face verification approaches.
10.4CVMay 15, 2023
Towards Visual Saliency Explanations of Face VerificationYuhang Lu, Zewei Xu, Touradj Ebrahimi
In the past years, deep convolutional neural networks have been pushing the frontier of face recognition (FR) techniques in both verification and identification scenarios. Despite the high accuracy, they are often criticized for lacking explainability. There has been an increasing demand for understanding the decision-making process of deep face recognition systems. Recent studies have investigated the usage of visual saliency maps as an explanation, but they often lack a discussion and analysis in the context of face recognition. This paper concentrates on explainable face verification tasks and conceives a new explanation framework. Firstly, a definition of the saliency-based explanation method is provided, which focuses on the decisions made by the deep FR model. Secondly, a new model-agnostic explanation method named CorrRISE is proposed to produce saliency maps, which reveal both the similar and dissimilar regions of any given pair of face images. Then, an evaluation methodology is designed to measure the performance of general visual saliency explanation methods in face verification. Finally, substantial visual and quantitative results have shown that the proposed CorrRISE method demonstrates promising results in comparison with other state-of-the-art explainable face verification approaches.
0.2CLNov 11, 2021
Explainable Sentence-Level Sentiment Analysis for Amazon Product ReviewsXuechun Li, Xueyao Sun, Zewei Xu et al.
In this paper, we conduct a sentence level sentiment analysis on the product reviews from Amazon and thorough analysis on the model interpretability. For the sentiment analysis task, we use the BiLSTM model with attention mechanism. For the study of interpretability, we consider the attention weights distribution of single sentence and the attention weights of main aspect terms. The model has an accuracy of up to 0.96. And we find that the aspect terms have the same or even more attention weights than the sentimental words in sentences.