Jennifer Williams

Xiaoliang Wu, Chongxin Gan, Ke Liu et al.

Deep neural network-based automatic speaker verification (ASV) systems achieve impressive performance but their embedding representations remain opaque, lacking a structured and perceptually verifiable explanation of the vocal characteristics they encode. Existing approaches either require annotation of speaker attributes or introduce alternative representations whose interpretability is unvalidated with listeners. We propose Listenable Interpretable Speaker Embeddings (LISE), a label-free framework that decomposes pretrained speaker embeddings into a small set of components. This decomposition yields a structured representation that supports the analysis of what information has been encoded by speaker embeddings. LISE preserves ASV performance with negligible EER degradation on x-vector and ECAPA-TDNN. Crucially, the interpretability of these components for human listeners is demonstrated through listening experiments, where participants distinguished speakers with 83.9% accuracy.

Xiaoliang Wu, Qiyang Sun, Yupei Li et al.

Dysarthria severity assessment is essential for therapy planning and longitudinal monitoring, yet manual perceptual rating is time-consuming and variable across clinicians. Although deep learning models achieve strong performance, their black-box nature limits clinical adoption. Existing speech explainability methods typically provide acoustic feature importance scores that are difficult for end-users to interpret. We propose an influence-based, instance-level explainability framework that explains each decision through supportive and competing training samples. Using gradient-based influence approximations, we compute per-utterance influence scores to identify supportive and competing training samples for each prediction. Controlled deletion experiments from 5 to 20 percent validate the explanations, showing that removing highly influential samples systematically shifts predictions. This approach provides auditable explanations by linking decisions to perceptible reference cases.

Jennifer Williams, Leila Wehbe

Similar to how differences in the proficiency of the cardiovascular and musculoskeletal system predict an individual's athletic ability, differences in how the same brain region encodes information across individuals may explain their behavior. However, when studying how the brain encodes information, researchers choose different neuroimaging tasks (e.g., language or motor tasks), which can rely on processing different types of information and can modulate different brain regions. We hypothesize that individual differences in how information is encoded in the brain are task-specific and predict different behavior measures. We propose a framework using encoding-models to identify individual differences in brain encoding and test if these differences can predict behavior. We evaluate our framework using task functional magnetic resonance imaging data. Our results indicate that individual differences revealed by encoding-models are a powerful tool for predicting behavior, and that researchers should optimize their choice of task and encoding-model for their behavior of interest.