Retrieval of Family Members Using Siamese Neural NetworkJun Yu, Guochen Xie, Mengyan Li et al.
Retrieval of family members in the wild aims at finding family members of the given subject in the dataset, which is useful in finding the lost children and analyzing the kinship. However, due to the diversity in age, gender, pose and illumination of the collected data, this task is always challenging. To solve this problem, we propose our solution with deep Siamese neural network. Our solution can be divided into two parts: similarity computation and ranking. In training procedure, the Siamese network firstly takes two candidate images as input and produces two feature vectors. And then, the similarity between the two vectors is computed with several fully connected layers. While in inference procedure, we try another similarity computing method by dropping the followed several fully connected layers and directly computing the cosine similarity of the two feature vectors. After similarity computation, we use the ranking algorithm to merge the similarity scores with the same identity and output the ordered list according to their similarities. To gain further improvement, we try different combinations of backbones, training methods and similarity computing methods. Finally, we submit the best combination as our solution and our team(ustc-nelslip) obtains favorable result in the track3 of the RFIW2020 challenge with the first runner-up, which verifies the effectiveness of our method. Our code is available at: https://github.com/gniknoil/FG2020-kinship
Deep Fusion Siamese Network for Automatic Kinship VerificationJun Yu, Mengyan Li, Xinlong Hao et al.
Automatic kinship verification aims to determine whether some individuals belong to the same family. It is of great research significance to help missing persons reunite with their families. In this work, the challenging problem is progressively addressed in two respects. First, we propose a deep siamese network to quantify the relative similarity between two individuals. When given two input face images, the deep siamese network extracts the features from them and fuses these features by combining and concatenating. Then, the fused features are fed into a fully-connected network to obtain the similarity score between two faces, which is used to verify the kinship. To improve the performance, a jury system is also employed for multi-model fusion. Second, two deep siamese networks are integrated into a deep triplet network for tri-subject (i.e., father, mother and child) kinship verification, which is intended to decide whether a child is related to a pair of parents or not. Specifically, the obtained similarity scores of father-child and mother-child are weighted to generate the parent-child similarity score for kinship verification. Recognizing Families In the Wild (RFIW) is a challenging kinship recognition task with multiple tracks, which is based on Families in the Wild (FIW), a large-scale and comprehensive image database for automatic kinship recognition. The Kinship Verification (track I) and Tri-Subject Verification (track II) are supported during the ongoing RFIW2020 Challenge. Our team (ustc-nelslip) ranked 1st in track II, and 3rd in track I. The code is available at https://github.com/gniknoil/FG2020-kinship.
30.4CLJan 22, 2025
ACEBench: Who Wins the Match Point in Tool Usage?Chen Chen, Xinlong Hao, Weiwen Liu et al.
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant potential in decision-making and reasoning, particularly when integrated with various tools to effectively solve complex problems. However, existing benchmarks for evaluating LLMs' tool usage face several limitations: (1) limited evaluation scenarios, often lacking assessments in real multi-turn dialogue contexts; (2) narrow evaluation dimensions, with insufficient detailed assessments of how LLMs use tools; and (3) reliance on LLMs or real API executions for evaluation, which introduces significant overhead. To address these challenges, we introduce ACEBench, a comprehensive benchmark for assessing tool usage in LLMs. ACEBench categorizes data into three primary types based on evaluation methodology: Normal, Special, and Agent. "Normal" evaluates tool usage in basic scenarios; "Special" evaluates tool usage in situations with ambiguous or incomplete instructions; "Agent" evaluates tool usage through multi-agent interactions to simulate real-world, multi-turn dialogues. We conducted extensive experiments using ACEBench, analyzing various LLMs in-depth and providing a more granular examination of error causes across different data types.
13.0CLMay 12, 2025
ToolACE-DEV: Self-Improving Tool Learning via Decomposition and EVolutionXu Huang, Weiwen Liu, Xingshan Zeng et al.
The tool-using capability of large language models (LLMs) enables them to access up-to-date external information and handle complex tasks. Current approaches to enhancing this capability primarily rely on distilling advanced models by data synthesis. However, this method incurs significant costs associated with advanced model usage and often results in data compatibility issues, led by the high discrepancy in the knowledge scope between the advanced model and the target model. To address these challenges, we propose ToolACE-DEV, a self-improving framework for tool learning. First, we decompose the tool-learning objective into sub-tasks that enhance basic tool-making and tool-using abilities. Then, we introduce a self-evolving paradigm that allows lightweight models to self-improve, reducing reliance on advanced LLMs. Extensive experiments validate the effectiveness of our approach across models of varying scales and architectures.