Sanjana Dulam

Ishita Goyal, Priyank Bhandia, Sanjana Dulam

Sarcasm is a form of irony that involves saying or writing something that is opposite or opposite to what one really means, often in a humorous or mocking way. It is often used to mock or mock someone or something, or to be humorous or amusing. Sarcasm is usually conveyed through tone of voice, facial expressions, or other forms of nonverbal communication, but it can also be indicated by the use of certain words or phrases that are typically associated with irony or humor. Sarcasm detection is difficult because it relies on context and non-verbal cues. It can also be culturally specific, subjective and ambiguous. In this work, we fine-tune the RoBERTa based sarcasm detection model presented in Abaskohi et al. [2022] to get to within 0.02 F1 of the state-of-the-art (Hercog et al. [2022]) on the iSarcasm dataset (Oprea and Magdy [2019]). This performance is achieved by augmenting iSarcasm with a pruned version of the Self Annotated Reddit Corpus (SARC) (Khodak et al. [2017]). Our pruned version is 100 times smaller than the subset of SARC used to train the state-of-the-art model.

Yuhan Hou, Tianji Rao, Jeremy Tan et al.

The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) sets the federal funds rate, shaping monetary policy and the broader economy. We introduce \emph{FedSight AI}, a multi-agent framework that uses large language models (LLMs) to simulate FOMC deliberations and predict policy outcomes. Member agents analyze structured indicators and unstructured inputs such as the Beige Book, debate options, and vote, replicating committee reasoning. A Chain-of-Draft (CoD) extension further improves efficiency and accuracy by enforcing concise multistage reasoning. Evaluated at 2023-2024 meetings, FedSight CoD achieved accuracy of 93.75\% and stability of 93.33\%, outperforming baselines including MiniFed and Ordinal Random Forest (RF), while offering transparent reasoning aligned with real FOMC communications.

William Flanagan, Mukunda Das, Rajitha Ramanayake et al.

As Generative Artificial Intelligence is adopted across the financial services industry, a significant barrier to adoption and usage is measuring model performance. Historical machine learning metrics can oftentimes fail to generalize to GenAI workloads and are often supplemented using Subject Matter Expert (SME) Evaluation. Even in this combination, many projects fail to account for various unique risks present in choosing specific metrics. Additionally, many widespread benchmarks created by foundational research labs and educational institutions fail to generalize to industrial use. This paper explains these challenges and provides a Risk Assessment Framework to allow for better application of SME and machine learning Metrics