Xiaoyan Gao

Yi-Fan Lu, Xian-Ling Mao, Tian Lan et al.

Event extraction has gained extensive research attention due to its broad range of applications. However, the current mainstream evaluation method for event extraction relies on token-level exact match, which misjudges numerous semantic-level correct cases. This reliance leads to a significant discrepancy between the evaluated performance of models under exact match criteria and their real performance. To address this problem, we propose a reliable and semantic evaluation framework for event extraction, named RAEE, which accurately assesses extraction results at semantic-level instead of token-level. Specifically, RAEE leverages large language models (LLMs) as evaluation agents, incorporating an adaptive mechanism to achieve adaptive evaluations for precision and recall of triggers and arguments. Extensive experiments demonstrate that: (1) RAEE achieves a very strong correlation with human judgments; (2) after reassessing 14 models, including advanced LLMs, on 10 datasets, there is a significant performance gap between exact match and RAEE. The exact match evaluation significantly underestimates the performance of existing event extraction models, and in particular underestimates the capabilities of LLMs; (3) fine-grained analysis under RAEE evaluation reveals insightful phenomena worth further exploration. The evaluation toolkit of our proposed RAEE is publicly released.

Tian Lan, Xian-Ling Mao, Xiaoyan Gao et al.

We study the coarse-grained selection module in retrieval-based chatbot. Coarse-grained selection is a basic module in a retrieval-based chatbot, which constructs a rough candidate set from the whole database to speed up the interaction with customers. So far, there are two kinds of approaches for coarse-grained selection module: (1) sparse representation; (2) dense representation. To the best of our knowledge, there is no systematic comparison between these two approaches in retrieval-based chatbots, and which kind of method is better in real scenarios is still an open question. In this paper, we first systematically compare these two methods from four aspects: (1) effectiveness; (2) index stoarge; (3) search time cost; (4) human evaluation. Extensive experiment results demonstrate that dense representation method significantly outperforms the sparse representation, but costs more time and storage occupation. In order to overcome these fatal weaknesses of dense representation method, we propose an ultra-fast, low-storage, and highly effective Deep Semantic Hashing Coarse-grained selection method, called DSHC model. Specifically, in our proposed DSHC model, a hashing optimizing module that consists of two autoencoder models is stacked on a trained dense representation model, and three loss functions are designed to optimize it. The hash codes provided by hashing optimizing module effectively preserve the rich semantic and similarity information in dense vectors. Extensive experiment results prove that, our proposed DSHC model can achieve much faster speed and lower storage than sparse representation, with limited performance loss compared with dense representation. Besides, our source codes have been publicly released for future research.

Tian Lan, Xian-Ling Mao, Wei Wei et al.

Open-domain generative dialogue systems have attracted considerable attention over the past few years. Currently, how to automatically evaluate them, is still a big challenge problem. As far as we know, there are three kinds of automatic methods to evaluate the open-domain generative dialogue systems: (1) Word-overlap-based metrics; (2) Embedding-based metrics; (3) Learning-based metrics. Due to the lack of systematic comparison, it is not clear which kind of metrics are more effective. In this paper, we will first measure systematically all kinds of automatic evaluation metrics over the same experimental setting to check which kind is best. Through extensive experiments, the learning-based metrics are demonstrated that they are the most effective evaluation metrics for open-domain generative dialogue systems. Moreover, we observe that nearly all learning-based metrics depend on the negative sampling mechanism, which obtains an extremely imbalanced and low-quality dataset to train a score model. In order to address this issue, we propose a novel and feasible learning-based metric that can significantly improve the correlation with human judgments by using augmented POsitive samples and valuable NEgative samples, called PONE. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our proposed evaluation method significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art learning-based evaluation methods, with an average correlation improvement of 13.18%. In addition, we have publicly released the codes of our proposed method and state-of-the-art baselines.

Xiaoyan Gao, Fuli Feng, Xiangnan He et al.

Food recommender systems play an important role in assisting users to identify the desired food to eat. Deciding what food to eat is a complex and multi-faceted process, which is influenced by many factors such as the ingredients, appearance of the recipe, the user's personal preference on food, and various contexts like what had been eaten in the past meals. In this work, we formulate the food recommendation problem as predicting user preference on recipes based on three key factors that determine a user's choice on food, namely, 1) the user's (and other users') history; 2) the ingredients of a recipe; and 3) the descriptive image of a recipe. To address this challenging problem, we develop a dedicated neural network based solution Hierarchical Attention based Food Recommendation (HAFR) which is capable of: 1) capturing the collaborative filtering effect like what similar users tend to eat; 2) inferring a user's preference at the ingredient level; and 3) learning user preference from the recipe's visual images. To evaluate our proposed method, we construct a large-scale dataset consisting of millions of ratings from AllRecipes.com. Extensive experiments show that our method outperforms several competing recommender solutions like Factorization Machine and Visual Bayesian Personalized Ranking with an average improvement of 12%, offering promising results in predicting user preference for food. Codes and dataset will be released upon acceptance.