Suvrajeet Sen

Di Zhang, Suvrajeet Sen

Stochastic First-Order (SFO) methods have been a cornerstone in addressing a broad spectrum of modern machine learning (ML) challenges. However, their efficacy is increasingly questioned, especially in large-scale applications where empirical evidence indicates potential performance limitations. In response, this paper proposes an innovative method specifically designed for kernel support vector machines (SVMs). This method not only achieves faster convergence per iteration but also exhibits enhanced scalability when compared to conventional SFO techniques. Diverging from traditional sample average approximation strategies that typically frame kernel SVM as an 'all-in-one' Quadratic Program (QP), our approach adopts adaptive sampling. This strategy incrementally refines approximation accuracy on an 'as-needed' basis. Crucially, this approach also inspires a decomposition-based algorithm, effectively decomposing parameter selection from error estimation, with the latter being independently determined for each data point. To exploit the quadratic nature of the kernel matrix, we introduce a stochastic conjugate subgradient method. This method preserves many benefits of first-order approaches while adeptly handling both nonlinearity and non-smooth aspects of the SVM problem. Thus, it extends beyond the capabilities of standard SFO algorithms for non-smooth convex optimization. The convergence rate of this novel method is thoroughly analyzed within this paper. Our experimental results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm not only maintains but potentially exceeds the scalability of SFO methods. Moreover, it significantly enhances both speed and accuracy of the optimization process.

Shuotao Diao, Suvrajeet Sen

Stochastic programming models can lead to very large-scale optimization problems for which it may be impossible to enumerate all possible scenarios. In such cases, one adopts a sampling-based solution methodology in which case the reliability of the resulting decisions may be suspect. For such instances, it is advisable to adopt methodologies that promote variance reduction. One such approach goes under a framework known as "compromise decision", which requires multiple replications of the solution procedure. This paper studies the reliability of stochastic programming solutions resulting from the "compromise decision" process. This process is characterized by minimizing an aggregation of objective function approximations across replications, presumably conducted in parallel. We refer to the post-parallel-processing problem as the problem of "compromise decision". We quantify the reliability of compromise decisions by estimating the expectation and variance of the "pessimistic distance" of sampled instances from the set of true optimal decisions. Such pessimistic distance is defined as an estimate of the largest possible distance of the solution of the sampled instance from the "true" optimal solution set. The Rademacher average of instances is used to bound the sample complexity of the compromise decision.