Yingxue Fu

Yingxue Fu

Existing discourse formalisms use different taxonomies of discourse relations, which require expert knowledge to understand, posing a challenge for annotation and automatic classification. We show that discourse relations can be effectively captured by some simple cognitively inspired dimensions proposed by Sanders et al.(2018). Our experiments on cross-framework discourse relation classification (PDTB & RST) demonstrate that it is possible to transfer knowledge of discourse relations for one framework to another framework by means of these dimensions, in spite of differences in discourse segmentation of the two frameworks. This manifests the effectiveness of these dimensions in characterizing discourse relations across frameworks. Ablation studies reveal that different dimensions influence different types of discourse relations. The patterns can be explained by the role of dimensions in characterizing and distinguishing different relations. We also report our experimental results on automatic prediction of these dimensions.

Yingxue Fu, Mark-Jan Nederhof

By using a trigram model and fine-tuning a pretrained BERT model for sequence classification, we show that machine translation and human translation can be classified with an accuracy above chance level, which suggests that machine translation and human translation are different in a systematic way. The classification accuracy of machine translation is much higher than of human translation. We show that this may be explained by the difference in lexical diversity between machine translation and human translation. If machine translation has independent patterns from human translation, automatic metrics which measure the deviation of machine translation from human translation may conflate difference with quality. Our experiment with two different types of automatic metrics shows correlation with the result of the classification task. Therefore, we suggest the difference in lexical diversity between machine translation and human translation be given more attention in machine translation evaluation.

Yingxue Fu, Elaine Ui Dhonnchadha

This paper studies the differences between different types of newspapers in expressing temporal information, which is a topic that has not received much attention. Techniques from the fields of temporal processing and pattern mining are employed to investigate this topic. First, a corpus annotated with temporal information is created by the author. Then, sequences of temporal information tags mixed with part-of-speech tags are extracted from the corpus. The TKS algorithm is used to mine skip-gram patterns from the sequences. With these patterns, the signatures of the four newspapers are obtained. In order to make the signatures uniquely characterize the newspapers, we revise the signatures by removing reference patterns. Through examining the number of patterns in the signatures and revised signatures, the proportion of patterns containing temporal information tags and the specific patterns containing temporal information tags, it is found that newspapers differ in ways of expressing temporal information.