Prashant Krishnamurthy

CR
h-index3
4papers
10citations
Novelty40%
AI Score41

4 Papers

QUANT-PHMay 5
Sequential vs. Simultaneous Entanglement Swapping under Optimal Link-Layer Control

Priyam Srivastava, Akshat R. Sabavat, Siddharth Jain et al.

Connection-less, packet-switched quantum network architectures distribute entanglement across multi-hop paths through sequential entanglement swapping, in which each node acts on purely local state information. The architectural advantages over the connection-oriented alternative -- simultaneous SWAP-ASAP -- are compelling, but sequential swapping holds partial chains in intermediate buffers between successive swaps, exposing them to memory decoherence in a way simultaneous SWAP-ASAP avoids by design. We present a proof-of-principle study at fixed chain length $n = 4$ in which each elementary link is governed by a fixed reinforcement-learning policy optimizing the secret-key rate of the six-state protocol, leaving the network-layer protocol as the sole independent variable. Sweeping the network-layer memory coherence time $T_c^{\mathrm{ext}}$ over four orders of magnitude reveals a clear regime structure governed by the dimensionless ratio $T_c^{\mathrm{ext}}/τ$, where $τ$ is the per-link entanglement heralding latency. Simultaneous SWAP-ASAP delivers a constant rate across the full sweep. Sequential swapping, by contrast, collapses to zero end-to-end deliveries below $T_c^{\mathrm{ext}}/τ= 25$, and begins recovering at $T_c^{\mathrm{ext}}/τ= 50$. It remains limited by the simultaneous rate, which it saturates only at the relaxed end of the sweep. These results suggest that the connection-less penalty is a near-term phenomenon tied to present-day memory coherence rather than a fundamental property of sequential swapping.

NIApr 30
Fidelity-Guaranteed Entanglement Routing with Distributed Purification Planning

Anthony Gatti, Anoosha Fayyaz, Prashant Krishnamurthy et al.

Many quantum-network applications require end-to-end Bell pairs whose fidelity exceeds a request-specific threshold, but existing entanglement routing algorithms either optimize only throughput without regard for fidelity or enforce fidelity guarantees using centralized controllers with global link-state knowledge. We present Q-GUARD, an online entanglement routing algorithm that enforces per-request fidelity thresholds within a distributed protocol model in which nodes exchange link-state information only with their $k$-hop neighbors. After link outcomes are realized in each slot, Q-GUARD builds per-link purification cost tables from realized Bell pairs, allocates per-hop fidelity targets using a Werner-state equal-split rule, and selects between candidate path segments using a segment-local expected-goodput (EXG) metric that jointly accounts for swap success, purification overhead, and resource availability. We also introduce Q-GUARD-WS, an extension that exploits per-link hardware quality estimates to allocate purification effort non-uniformly across hops. On synthetic 100-node topologies with heterogeneous link fidelity and stochastic BBPSSW purification, Q-GUARD raises the qualified success rate from under 20\% to over 85\% on 4-hop paths and nearly doubles the qualified service radius in Euclidean distance relative to throughput-only and naive-purification baselines, while Q-GUARD-WS provides additional throughput gains under high hardware heterogeneity.

CROct 15, 2025
On-Chain Decentralized Learning and Cost-Effective Inference for DeFi Attack Mitigation

Abdulrahman Alhaidari, Balaji Palanisamy, Prashant Krishnamurthy

Billions of dollars are lost every year in DeFi platforms by transactions exploiting business logic or accounting vulnerabilities. Existing defenses focus on static code analysis, public mempool screening, attacker contract detection, or trusted off-chain monitors, none of which prevents exploits submitted through private relays or malicious contracts that execute within the same block. We present the first decentralized, fully on-chain learning framework that: (i) performs gas-prohibitive computation on Layer-2 to reduce cost, (ii) propagates verified model updates to Layer-1, and (iii) enables gas-bounded, low-latency inference inside smart contracts. A novel Proof-of-Improvement (PoIm) protocol governs the training process and verifies each decentralized micro update as a self-verifying training transaction. Updates are accepted by \textit{PoIm} only if they demonstrably improve at least one core metric (e.g., accuracy, F1-score, precision, or recall) on a public benchmark without degrading any of the other core metrics, while adversarial proposals get financially penalized through an adaptable test set for evolving threats. We develop quantization and loop-unrolling techniques that enable inference for logistic regression, SVM, MLPs, CNNs, and gated RNNs (with support for formally verified decision tree inference) within the Ethereum block gas limit, while remaining bit-exact to their off-chain counterparts, formally proven in Z3. We curate 298 unique real-world exploits (2020 - 2025) with 402 exploit transactions across eight EVM chains, collectively responsible for \$3.74 B in losses.

SIOct 16, 2012
Gaming the Game: Honeypot Venues Against Cheaters in Location-based Social Networks

Konstantinos Pelechrinis, Prashant Krishnamurthy, Ke Zhang

The proliferation of location-based social networks (LBSNs) has provided the community with an abundant source of information that can be exploited and used in many different ways. LBSNs offer a number of conveniences to its participants, such as - but not limited to - a list of places in the vicinity of a user, recommendations for an area never explored before provided by other peers, tracking of friends, monetary rewards in the form of special deals from the venues visited as well as a cheap way of advertisement for the latter. However, service convenience and security have followed disjoint paths in LBSNs and users can misuse the offered features. The major threat for the service providers is that of fake check-ins. Users can easily manipulate the localization module of the underlying application and declare their presence in a counterfeit location. The incentives for these behaviors can be both earning monetary as well as virtual rewards. Therefore, while fake check-ins driven from the former motive can cause monetary losses, those aiming in virtual rewards are also harmful. In particular, they can significantly degrade the services offered from the LBSN providers (such as recommendations) or third parties using these data (e.g., urban planners). In this paper, we propose and analyze a honeypot venue-based solution, enhanced with a challenge-response scheme, that flags users who are generating fake spatial information. We believe that our work will stimulate further research on this important topic and will provide new directions with regards to possible solutions.