Pamela Carreno-Medrano

Emmanuel Fashae, Michael Burke, Leimin Tian et al.

Robotic systems for household object rearrangement often rely on latent preference models inferred from human demonstrations. While effective at prediction, these models offer limited insight into the interpretable factors that guide human decisions. We introduce an explicit formulation of object arrangement preferences along four interpretable constructs: spatial practicality (putting items where they naturally fit best in the space), habitual convenience (making frequently used items easy to reach), semantic coherence (placing items together if they are used for the same task or are contextually related), and commonsense appropriateness (putting things where people would usually expect to find them). To capture these constructs, we designed and validated a self-report questionnaire through a 63-participant online study. Results confirm the psychological distinctiveness of these constructs and their explanatory power across two scenarios (kitchen and living room). We demonstrate the utility of these constructs by integrating them into a Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) planner and show that when guided by participant-derived preferences, our planner can generate reasonable arrangements that closely align with those generated by participants. This work contributes a compact, interpretable formulation of object arrangement preferences and a demonstration of how it can be operationalized for robot planning.

William Z. Ye, Eduardo B. Sandoval, Pamela Carreno-Medrano et al.

Robotics has been a popular field of research in the past few decades, with much success in industrial applications such as manufacturing and logistics. This success is led by clearly defined use cases and controlled operating environments. However, robotics has yet to make a large impact in domestic settings. This is due in part to the difficulty and complexity of designing mass-manufactured robots that can succeed in the variety of homes and environments that humans live in and that can operate safely in close proximity to humans. This paper explores the use of contextual affordances to enable safe exploration and learning in robotic scenarios targeted in the home. In particular, we propose a simple state representation that allows us to extend contextual affordances to larger state spaces and showcase how affordances can improve the success and convergence rate of a reinforcement learning algorithm in simulation. Our results suggest that after further iterations, it is possible to consider the implementation of this approach in a real robot manipulator. Furthermore, in the long term, this work could be the foundation for future explorations of human-robot interactions in complex domestic environments. This could be possible once state-of-the-art robot manipulators achieve the required level of dexterity for the described affordances in this paper.

Junxian Wang, Wesley P. Chan, Pamela Carreno-Medrano et al.

Recent protocols and metrics for training and evaluating autonomous robot navigation through crowds are inconsistent due to diversified definitions of "social behavior". This makes it difficult, if not impossible, to effectively compare published navigation algorithms. Furthermore, with the lack of a good evaluation protocol, resulting algorithms may fail to generalize, due to lack of diversity in training. To address these gaps, this paper facilitates a more comprehensive evaluation and objective comparison of crowd navigation algorithms by proposing a consistent set of metrics that accounts for both efficiency and social conformity, and a systematic protocol comprising multiple crowd navigation scenarios of varying complexity for evaluation. We tested four state-of-the-art algorithms under this protocol. Results revealed that some state-of-the-art algorithms have much challenge in generalizing, and using our protocol for training, we were able to improve the algorithm's performance. We demonstrate that the set of proposed metrics provides more insight and effectively differentiates the performance of these algorithms with respect to efficiency and social conformity.

Pamela Carreno-Medrano, Leimin Tian, Aimee Allen et al.

Robots are increasingly being deployed in public spaces. However, the general population rarely has the opportunity to nominate what they would prefer or expect a robot to do in these contexts. Since most people have little or no experience interacting with a robot, it is not surprising that robots deployed in the real world may fail to gain acceptance or engage their intended users. To address this issue, we examine users' understanding of robots in public spaces and their expectations of appropriate uses of robots in these spaces. Furthermore, we investigate how these perceptions and expectations change as users engage and interact with a robot. To support this goal, we conducted a participatory design workshop in which participants were actively involved in the prototyping and testing of a robot's behaviours in simulation and on the physical robot. Our work highlights how social and interaction contexts influence users' perception of robots in public spaces and how users' design and understanding of what are appropriate robot behaviors shifts as they observe the enactment of their designs.

Pamela Carreno-Medrano, Stephen L. Smith, Dana Kulic

When a robot learns from human examples, most approaches assume that the human partner provides examples of optimal behavior. However, there are applications in which the robot learns from non-expert humans. We argue that the robot should learn not only about the human's objectives, but also about their expertise level. The robot could then leverage this joint information to reduce or increase the frequency at which it provides assistance to its human's partner or be more cautious when learning new skills from novice users. Similarly, by taking into account the human's expertise, the robot would also be able of inferring a human's true objectives even when the human's fails to properly demonstrate these objectives due to a lack of expertise. In this paper, we propose to jointly infer the expertise level and objective function of a human given observations of their (possibly) non-optimal demonstrations. Two inference approaches are proposed. In the first approach, inference is done over a finite, discrete set of possible objective functions and expertise levels. In the second approach, the robot optimizes over the space of all possible hypotheses and finds the objective function and expertise level that best explain the observed human behavior. We demonstrate our proposed approaches both in simulation and with real user data.