George Osipov

Konrad K. Dabrowski, Peter Jonsson, Sebastian Ordyniak et al.

We show optimal FPT-approximability results for solving almost satisfiable systems of modular linear equations, completing the picture of the parameterized complexity and FPT-approximability landscape for the Min-$r$-Lin$(\mathbb{Z}_m)$ problem for every $r$ and $m$. In Min-$r$-Lin$(\mathbb{Z}_m)$, we are given a system $S$ of linear equations modulo $m$, each on at most $r$ variables, and the goal is to find a subset $Z \subseteq S$ of minimum cardinality such that $S - Z$ is satisfiable. The problem is UGC-hard to approximate within any constant factor for every $r \geq 2$ and $m \geq 2$, which motivates studying it through the lens of parameterized complexity with solution size as the parameter. From previous work (Dabrowski et al. SODA'23/TALG and ESA'25) we know that Min-$r$-Lin$(\mathbb{Z}_m)$ is W[1]-hard to FPT-approximate within any constant factor when $r \geq 3$, and that Min-$2$-Lin$(\mathbb{Z}_m)$ is in FPT when $m$ is prime and W[1]-hard when $m$ has at least two distinct prime factors. The case when $m = p^d$ for some prime $p$ and $d \geq 2$ has remained an open problem. We resolve this problem in this paper and prove the following: (1) We prove that Min-$2$-Lin$(\mathbb{Z}_{p^d})$ is in FPT for every prime $p$ and $d \geq 1$. This implies that Min-$2$-Lin$(\mathbb{Z}_{m})$ can be FPT-approximated within a factor of $ω(m)$, where $ω$ is the number of distinct prime factors of $m$. (2) We show that, under the ETH, Min-$2$-Lin$(\mathbb{Z}_m)$ cannot be FPT-approximated within $ω(m) - ε$ for any $ε> 0$. Our main algorithmic contribution is a new technique coined balanced subgraph covering, which generalizes important balanced subgraphs of Dabrowski et al. (SODA'23/TALG) and shadow removal of Marx and Razgon (STOC'11/SICOMP). For the lower bounds, we develop a framework for proving optimality of FPT-approximation factors under the ETH.

Leif Eriksson, Victor Lagerkvist, Sebastian Ordyniak et al.

The quantified Boolean formula problem (QBF) is a well-known PSpace-complete problem with rich expressive power, and is generally viewed as the SAT analogue for PSpace. Given that many problems today are solved in practice by reducing to SAT, and then using highly optimized SAT solvers, it is natural to ask whether problems in PSpace are amenable to this approach. While SAT solvers exploit hidden structural properties, such as backdoors to tractability, backdoor analysis for QBF is comparatively very limited. We present a comprehensive study of the (parameterized) complexity of QBF parameterized by backdoor size to the largest tractable syntactic classes: HORN, 2-SAT, and AFFINE. While SAT is in FPT under this parameterization, we prove that QBF remains PSpace-hard even on formulas with backdoors of constant size. Parameterizing additionally by the quantifier depth, we design FPT-algorithms for the classes 2-SAT and AFFINE, and show that 3-HORN is W[1]-hard. As our next contribution, we vastly extend the applicability of QBF backdoors not only for the syntactic classes defined above but also for tractable classes defined via structural restrictions, such as formulas with bounded incidence treewidth and quantifier depth. To this end, we introduce enhanced backdoors: these are separators S of size at most k in the primal graph such that S together with all variables contained in any purely universal component of the primal graph minus S is a backdoor. We design FPT-algorithms with respect to k for both evaluation and detection of enhanced backdoors to all tractable classes of QBF listed above and more.

Peter Jonsson, Victor Lagerkvist, George Osipov

The constraint satisfaction problem asks to decide if a set of constraints over a relational structure $\mathcal{A}$ is satisfiable (CSP$(\mathcal{A})$). We consider CSP$(\mathcal{A} \cup \mathcal{B})$ where $\mathcal{A}$ is a structure and $\mathcal{B}$ is an alien structure, and analyse its (parameterized) complexity when at most $k$ alien constraints are allowed. We establish connections and obtain transferable complexity results to several well-studied problems that previously escaped classification attempts. Our novel approach, utilizing logical and algebraic methods, yields an FPT versus pNP dichotomy for arbitrary finite structures and sharper dichotomies for Boolean structures and first-order reducts of $(\mathbb{N},=)$ (equality CSPs), together with many partial results for general $ω$-categorical structures.

Leif Eriksson, Victor Lagerkvist, Sebastian Ordyniak et al.

Determining the validity of a quantified Boolean formula (QBF) is a PSPACE-complete problem with rich expressive power. Despite interest in efficient solvers, there is, compared to problems in NP, a lack of positive theoretical results, and in the parameterized complexity setting one often has to restrict the quantifier prefix (e.g., bounding alternations) to obtain fixed parameter tractability (FPT). We propose a new parameter: the number of variables in clauses that has to be removed before reaching a tractable class (a clause covering (CC) backdoor). We are then interested in solving QBF in FPT time given a CC-backdoor of size $k$. We consider the three classical, tractable cases of QBF as base classes: Horn, 2-CNF, and linear equations. We establish W[1]-hardness for Horn but prove FPT for the others, and prove that in a precise, algebraic sense, we are only missing one important case for a full dichotomy. Our algorithms are non-trivial and depend on propagation, and Gaussian elimination, respectively, and are comparably unexplored for QBF.

Leif Eriksson, Victor Lagerkvist, George Osipov et al.

The quantified Boolean formula (QBF) problem is an important decision problem generally viewed as the archetype for PSPACE-completeness. Many problems of central interest in AI are in general not included in NP, e.g., planning, model checking, and non-monotonic reasoning, and for such problems QBF has successfully been used as a modelling tool. However, solvers for QBF are not as advanced as state of the art SAT solvers, which has prevented QBF from becoming a universal modelling language for PSPACE-complete problems. A theoretical explanation is that QBF (as well as many other PSPACE-complete problems) lacks natural parameters} guaranteeing fixed-parameter tractability (FPT). In this paper we tackle this problem and consider a simple but overlooked parameter: the number of existentially quantified variables. This natural parameter is virtually unexplored in the literature which one might find surprising given the general scarcity of FPT algorithms for QBF. Via this parameterization we then develop a novel FPT algorithm applicable to QBF instances in conjunctive normal form (CNF) of bounded clause length. We complement this by a W[1]-hardness result for QBF in CNF of unbounded clause length as well as sharper lower bounds for the bounded arity case under the (strong) exponential-time hypothesis.

Konrad K. Dabrowski, Peter Jonsson, Sebastian Ordyniak et al.

The constraint satisfaction problem (CSP) has important applications in computer science and AI. In particular, infinite-domain CSPs have been intensively used in subareas of AI such as spatio-temporal reasoning. Since constraint satisfaction is a computationally hard problem, much work has been devoted to identifying restricted problems that are efficiently solvable. One way of doing this is to restrict the interactions of variables and constraints, and a highly successful approach is to bound the treewidth of the underlying primal graph. Bodirsky & Dalmau [J. Comput. System. Sci. 79(1), 2013] and Huang et al. [Artif. Intell. 195, 2013] proved that CSP$(Γ)$ can be solved in $n^{f(w)}$ time (where $n$ is the size of the instance, $w$ is the treewidth of the primal graph and $f$ is a computable function) for certain classes of constraint languages $Γ$. We improve this bound to $f(w) \cdot n^{O(1)}$, where the function $f$ only depends on the language $Γ$, for CSPs whose basic relations have the patchwork property. Hence, such problems are fixed-parameter tractable and our algorithm is asymptotically faster than the previous ones. Additionally, our approach is not restricted to binary constraints, so it is applicable to a strictly larger class of problems than that of Huang et al. However, there exist natural problems that are covered by Bodirsky & Dalmau's algorithm but not by ours, and we begin investigating ways of generalising our results to larger families of languages. We also analyse our algorithm with respect to its running time and show that it is optimal (under the Exponential Time Hypothesis) for certain languages such as Allen's Interval Algebra.