Paul E. DesJardin

Georgios Georgalis, Kolos Retfalvi, Paul E. DesJardin et al.

In complex physical process characterization, such as the measurement of the regression rate for solid hybrid rocket fuels, where both the observation data and the model used have uncertainties originating from multiple sources, combining these in a systematic way for quantities of interest(QoI) remains a challenge. In this paper, we present a forward propagation uncertainty quantification (UQ) process to produce a probabilistic distribution for the observed regression rate $\dot{r}$. We characterized two input data uncertainty sources from the experiment (the distortion from the camera $U_c$ and the non-zero angle fuel placement $U_γ$), the prediction and model form uncertainty from the deep neural network ($U_m$), as well as the variability from the manually segmented images used for training it ($U_s$). We conducted seven case studies on combinations of these uncertainty sources with the model form uncertainty. The main contribution of this paper is the investigation and inclusion of the experimental image data uncertainties involved, and how to include them in a workflow when the QoI is the result of multiple sequential processes.

Georgios Georgalis, Alejandro Becerra, Kenneth Budzinski et al.

The goal of this paper is to demonstrate and address challenges related to all aspects of performing a complete uncertainty quantification analysis of a complicated physics-based simulation like a 2D slab burner direct numerical simulation (DNS). The UQ framework includes the development of data-driven surrogate models, propagation of parametric uncertainties to the fuel regression rate--the primary quantity of interest--and Bayesian calibration of the latent heat of sublimation and a chemical reaction temperature exponent using experimental data. Two surrogate models, a Gaussian Process (GP) and a Hierarchical Multiscale Surrogate (HMS) were constructed using an ensemble of 64 simulations generated via Latin Hypercube sampling. HMS is superior for prediction demonstrated by cross-validation and able to achieve an error < 15% when predicting multiscale boundary quantities just from a few far field inputs. Subsequent Bayesian calibration of chemical kinetics and fuel response parameters against experimental observations showed that the default values used in the DNS should be higher to better match measurements. This study highlights the importance of surrogate model selection and parameter calibration in quantifying uncertainty in predictions of fuel regression rates in complex combustion systems.