Tomoya Iwakura

Kohei Tsuji, Tatsuya Hiraoka, Yuchang Cheng et al.

NLP datasets may still contain annotation errors, even when they are manually annotated. Researchers have attempted to develop methods to automatically reduce the adverse effect of errors in datasets. However, existing methods are time-consuming because they require many trained models to detect errors. This paper proposes a time-saving method that utilizes a tokenization technique called subword regularization to simulate multiple error detection models for detecting errors. Our proposed method, SubRegWeigh, can perform annotation weighting four to five times faster than the existing method. Additionally, SubRegWeigh improved performance in document classification and named entity recognition tasks. In experiments with pseudo-incorrect labels, SubRegWeigh clearly identifies pseudo-incorrect labels as annotation errors. Our code is available at https://github.com/4ldk/SubRegWeigh .

Tatsuya Hiraoka, Tomoya Iwakura

Is preferred tokenization for humans also preferred for machine-learning (ML) models? This study examines the relations between preferred tokenization for humans (appropriateness and readability) and one for ML models (performance on an NLP task). The question texts of the Japanese commonsense question-answering dataset are tokenized with six different tokenizers, and the performances of human annotators and ML models were compared. Furthermore, we analyze relations among performance of answers by human and ML model, the appropriateness of tokenization for human, and response time to questions by human. This study provides a quantitative investigation result that shows that preferred tokenizations for humans and ML models are not necessarily always the same. The result also implies that existing methods using language models for tokenization could be a good compromise both for human and ML models.

Tatsuya Hiraoka, Tomoya Iwakura

This paper proposes a method to optimize tokenization for the performance improvement of already trained downstream models. Our method generates tokenization results attaining lower loss values of a given downstream model on the training data for restricting vocabularies and trains a tokenizer reproducing the tokenization results. Therefore, our method can be applied to variety of tokenization methods, while existing work cannot due to the simultaneous learning of the tokenizer and the downstream model. This paper proposes an example of the BiLSTM-based tokenizer with vocabulary restriction, which can capture wider contextual information for the tokenization process than non-neural-based tokenization methods used in existing work. Experimental results on text classification in Japanese, Chinese, and English text classification tasks show that the proposed method improves performance compared to the existing methods for tokenization optimization.

Jesse Atuhurra, Iqra Ali, Tomoya Iwakura et al.

Vision Language Models (VLMs) are pivotal for advancing perception in intelligent agents. Yet, evaluation of VLMs remains limited to predominantly English-centric benchmarks in which the image-text pairs comprise short texts. To evaluate VLM fine-grained abilities, in four languages under long-text settings, we introduce a novel multilingual benchmark VLURes featuring eight vision-and-language tasks, and a pioneering unrelatedness task, to probe the fine-grained Visual and Linguistic Understanding capabilities of VLMs across English, Japanese, and low-resource languages, Swahili, and Urdu. Our datasets, curated from web resources in the target language, encompass ten diverse image categories and rich textual context, introducing valuable vision-language resources for Swahili and Urdu. By prompting VLMs to generate responses and rationales, evaluated automatically and by native speakers, we uncover performance disparities across languages and tasks critical to intelligent agents, such as object recognition, scene understanding, and relationship understanding. We conducted evaluations of ten VLMs with VLURes. The best performing model, GPT-4o, achieves an overall accuracy of 90.8% and lags human performance by 6.7%, though the gap is larger for open-source models. The gap highlights VLURes' critical role in developing intelligent agents to tackle multi-modal visual reasoning.

Jesse Atuhurra, Iqra Ali, Tatsuya Hiraoka et al.

Large language models (LLMs) have increased interest in vision language models (VLMs), which process image-text pairs as input. Studies investigating the visual understanding ability of VLMs have been proposed, but such studies are still preliminary because existing datasets do not permit a comprehensive evaluation of the fine-grained visual linguistic abilities of VLMs across multiple languages. To further explore the strengths of VLMs, such as GPT-4V \cite{openai2023GPT4}, we developed new datasets for the systematic and qualitative analysis of VLMs. Our contribution is four-fold: 1) we introduced nine vision-and-language (VL) tasks (including object recognition, image-text matching, and more) and constructed multilingual visual-text datasets in four languages: English, Japanese, Swahili, and Urdu through utilizing templates containing \textit{questions} and prompting GPT4-V to generate the \textit{answers} and the \textit{rationales}, 2) introduced a new VL task named \textit{unrelatedness}, 3) introduced rationales to enable human understanding of the VLM reasoning process, and 4) employed human evaluation to measure the suitability of proposed datasets for VL tasks. We show that VLMs can be fine-tuned on our datasets. Our work is the first to conduct such analyses in Swahili and Urdu. Also, it introduces \textit{rationales} in VL analysis, which played a vital role in the evaluation.

Kohei Tsuji, Tatsuya Hiraoka, Yuchang Cheng et al.

This paper investigates how LLMs encode inputs with typos. We hypothesize that specific neurons and attention heads recognize typos and fix them internally using local and global contexts. We introduce a method to identify typo neurons and typo heads that work actively when inputs contain typos. Our experimental results suggest the following: 1) LLMs can fix typos with local contexts when the typo neurons in either the early or late layers are activated, even if those in the other are not. 2) Typo neurons in the middle layers are responsible for the core of typo-fixing with global contexts. 3) Typo heads fix typos by widely considering the context not focusing on specific tokens. 4) Typo neurons and typo heads work not only for typo-fixing but also for understanding general contexts.