Ali Samadani

Paratoo Alinia, Ali Samadani, Mladen Milosevic et al.

There exist significant gaps in research about how to design efficient in-bed lying posture tracking systems. These gaps can be articulated through several research questions as follows. First, can we design a single-sensor, pervasive, and inexpensive system that can accurately detect lying postures? Second, what computational models are most effective in the accurate detection of lying postures? Finally, what physical configuration of the sensor system is most effective for lying posture tracking? To answer these important research questions, in this article, we propose a comprehensive approach to design a sensor system that uses a single accelerometer along with machine learning algorithms for in-bed lying posture classification. We design two categories of machine learning algorithms based on deep learning and traditional classification with handcrafted features to detect lying postures. We also investigate what wearing sites are most effective in accurate detection of lying postures. We extensively evaluate the performance of the proposed algorithms on nine different body locations and four human lying postures using two datasets. Our results show that a system with a single accelerometer can be used with either deep learning or traditional classifiers to accurately detect lying postures. The best models in our approach achieve an F-Score that ranges from 95.2% to 97.8% with 0.03 to 0.05 coefficient of variation. The results also identify the thighs and chest as the most salient body sites for lying posture tracking. Our findings in this article suggest that because accelerometers are ubiquitous and inexpensive sensors, they can be a viable source of information for pervasive monitoring of in-bed postures.

Saman Parvaneh, Jonathan Rubin, Ali Samadani et al.

The visual scoring of arousals during sleep routinely conducted by sleep experts is a challenging task warranting an automatic approach. This paper presents an algorithm for automatic detection of arousals during sleep. Using the Physionet/CinC Challenge dataset, an 80-20% subject-level split was performed to create in-house training and test sets, respectively. The data for each subject in the training set was split to 30-second epochs with no overlap. A total of 428 features from EEG, EMG, EOG, airflow, and SaO2 in each epoch were extracted and used for creating subject-specific models based on an ensemble of bagged classification trees, resulting in 943 models. For marking arousal and non-arousal regions in the test set, the data in the test set was split to 30-second epochs with 50% overlaps. The average of arousal probabilities from different patient-specific models was assigned to each 30-second epoch and then a sample-wise probability vector with the same length as test data was created for model evaluation. Using the PhysioNet/CinC Challenge 2018 scoring criteria, AUPRCs of 0.25 and 0.21 were achieved for the in-house test and blind test sets, respectively.