5.1NAFeb 1, 2018
Convergence properties of the randomized extended Gauss-Seidel and Kaczmarz methodsAnna Ma, Deanna Needell, Aaditya Ramdas
The Kaczmarz and Gauss-Seidel methods both solve a linear system $\bf{X}\bfβ = \bf{y}$ by iteratively refining the solution estimate. Recent interest in these methods has been sparked by a proof of Strohmer and Vershynin which shows the randomized Kaczmarz method converges linearly in expectation to the solution. Lewis and Leventhal then proved a similar result for the randomized Gauss-Seidel algorithm. However, the behavior of both methods depends heavily on whether the system is under or overdetermined, and whether it is consistent or not. Here we provide a unified theory of both methods, their variants for these different settings, and draw connections between both approaches. In doing so, we also provide a proof that an extended version of randomized Gauss-Seidel converges linearly to the least norm solution in the underdetermined case (where the usual randomized Gauss Seidel fails to converge). We detail analytically and empirically the convergence properties of both methods and their extended variants in all possible system settings. With this result, a complete and rigorous theory of both methods is furnished.
1.2NAJan 9, 2019
Iterative methods for solving factorized linear systemsAnna Ma, Deanna Needell, Aaditya Ramdas
Stochastic iterative algorithms such as the Kaczmarz and Gauss-Seidel methods have gained recent attention because of their speed, simplicity, and the ability to approximately solve large-scale linear systems of equations without needing to access the entire matrix. In this work, we consider the setting where we wish to solve a linear system in a large matrix X that is stored in a factorized form, X = UV; this setting either arises naturally in many applications or may be imposed when working with large low-rank datasets for reasons of space required for storage. We propose a variant of the randomized Kaczmarz method for such systems that takes advantage of the factored form, and avoids computing X. We prove an exponential convergence rate and supplement our theoretical guarantees with experimental evidence demonstrating that the factored variant yields significant acceleration in convergence.
1.2NAJan 7, 2019
Stochastic Gradient Descent for Linear Systems with Missing DataAnna Ma, Deanna Needell
Traditional methods for solving linear systems have quickly become impractical due to an increase in the size of available data. Utilizing massive amounts of data is further complicated when the data is incomplete or has missing entries. In this work, we address the obstacles presented when working with large data and incomplete data simultaneously. In particular, we propose to adapt the Stochastic Gradient Descent method to address missing data in linear systems. Our proposed algorithm, the Stochastic Gradient Descent for Missing Data method (mSGD), is introduced and theoretical convergence guarantees are provided. In addition, we include numerical experiments on simulated and real world data that demonstrate the usefulness of our method.
6.4NAMay 26
Stochastic Gradient Descent for Incomplete Tensor Linear SystemsAnna Ma, Deanna Needell, Alexander Xue
Solving large tensor linear systems poses significant challenges due to the high volume of data stored, and it only becomes more challenging when some of the data is missing. Recently, Ma et al. showed that this problem can be tackled using a stochastic gradient descent-based method, assuming that the missing data follows a uniform missing pattern. We adapt the technique by modifying the update direction, showing that the method is applicable under other missing data models. We prove convergence results and experimentally verify these results on synthetic data.
4.3NAAug 31, 2023
A Note on Randomized Kaczmarz Algorithm for Solving Doubly-Noisy Linear SystemsEl Houcine Bergou, Soumia Boucherouite, Aritra Dutta et al.
Large-scale linear systems, $Ax=b$, frequently arise in practice and demand effective iterative solvers. Often, these systems are noisy due to operational errors or faulty data-collection processes. In the past decade, the randomized Kaczmarz (RK) algorithm has been studied extensively as an efficient iterative solver for such systems. However, the convergence study of RK in the noisy regime is limited and considers measurement noise in the right-hand side vector, $b$. Unfortunately, in practice, that is not always the case; the coefficient matrix $A$ can also be noisy. In this paper, we analyze the convergence of RK for {\textit{doubly-noisy} linear systems, i.e., when the coefficient matrix, $A$, has additive or multiplicative noise, and $b$ is also noisy}. In our analyses, the quantity $\tilde R=\| \tilde A^{\dagger} \|^2 \|\tilde A \|_F^2$ influences the convergence of RK, where $\tilde A$ represents a noisy version of $A$. We claim that our analysis is robust and realistically applicable, as we do not require information about the noiseless coefficient matrix, $A$, and considering different conditions on noise, we can control the convergence of RK. {We perform numerical experiments to substantiate our theoretical findings.}
1.2NAOct 9, 2025
Where Have All the Kaczmarz Iterates Gone?El Houcine Bergou, Soumia Boucherouite, Aritra Dutta et al.
The randomized Kaczmarz (RK) algorithm is one of the most computationally and memory-efficient iterative algorithms for solving large-scale linear systems. However, practical applications often involve noisy and potentially inconsistent systems. While the convergence of RK is well understood for consistent systems, the study of RK on noisy, inconsistent linear systems is limited. This paper investigates the asymptotic behavior of RK iterates in expectation when solving noisy and inconsistent systems, addressing the locations of their limit points. We explore the roles of singular vectors of the (noisy) coefficient matrix and derive bounds on the convergence horizon, which depend on the noise levels and system characteristics. Finally, we provide extensive numerical experiments that validate our theoretical findings, offering practical insights into the algorithm's performance under realistic conditions. These results establish a deeper understanding of the RK algorithm's limitations and robustness in noisy environments, paving the way for optimized applications in real-world scientific and engineering problems.
9.7NAAug 22, 2019
Iterative Hard Thresholding for Low CP-rank Tensor ModelsRachel Grotheer, Shuang Li, Anna Ma et al.
Recovery of low-rank matrices from a small number of linear measurements is now well-known to be possible under various model assumptions on the measurements. Such results demonstrate robustness and are backed with provable theoretical guarantees. However, extensions to tensor recovery have only recently began to be studied and developed, despite an abundance of practical tensor applications. Recently, a tensor variant of the Iterative Hard Thresholding method was proposed and theoretical results were obtained that guarantee exact recovery of tensors with low Tucker rank. In this paper, we utilize the same tensor version of the Restricted Isometry Property (RIP) to extend these results for tensors with low CANDECOMP/PARAFAC (CP) rank. In doing so, we leverage recent results on efficient approximations of CP decompositions that remove the need for challenging assumptions in prior works. We complement our theoretical findings with empirical results that showcase the potential of the approach.
2.7LGMay 31, 2019
Data-driven Algorithm Selection and Parameter Tuning: Two Case studies in Optimization and Signal ProcessingJesus A. De Loera, Jamie Haddock, Anna Ma et al.
Machine learning algorithms typically rely on optimization subroutines and are well-known to provide very effective outcomes for many types of problems. Here, we flip the reliance and ask the reverse question: can machine learning algorithms lead to more effective outcomes for optimization problems? Our goal is to train machine learning methods to automatically improve the performance of optimization and signal processing algorithms. As a proof of concept, we use our approach to improve two popular data processing subroutines in data science: stochastic gradient descent and greedy methods in compressed sensing. We provide experimental results that demonstrate the answer is ``yes'', machine learning algorithms do lead to more effective outcomes for optimization problems, and show the future potential for this research direction.
6.2LGMay 31, 2018
Analysis of Fast Structured Dictionary LearningSaiprasad Ravishankar, Anna Ma, Deanna Needell
Sparsity-based models and techniques have been exploited in many signal processing and imaging applications. Data-driven methods based on dictionary and sparsifying transform learning enable learning rich image features from data, and can outperform analytical models. In particular, alternating optimization algorithms have been popular for learning such models. In this work, we focus on alternating minimization for a specific structured unitary sparsifying operator learning problem, and provide a convergence analysis. While the algorithm converges to the critical points of the problem generally, our analysis establishes under mild assumptions, the local linear convergence of the algorithm to the underlying sparsifying model of the data. Analysis and numerical simulations show that our assumptions hold for standard probabilistic data models. In practice, the algorithm is robust to initialization.
1.4LGMay 8, 2014
Improving Image Clustering using Sparse Text and the Wisdom of the CrowdsAnna Ma, Arjuna Flenner, Deanna Needell et al.
We propose a method to improve image clustering using sparse text and the wisdom of the crowds. In particular, we present a method to fuse two different kinds of document features, image and text features, and use a common dictionary or "wisdom of the crowds" as the connection between the two different kinds of documents. With the proposed fusion matrix, we use topic modeling via non-negative matrix factorization to cluster documents.