Xing Li

Xufeng Yao, Yiwen Wang, Xing Li et al.

Register Transfer Level (RTL) code optimization is crucial for enhancing the efficiency and performance of digital circuits during early synthesis stages. Currently, optimization relies heavily on manual efforts by skilled engineers, often requiring multiple iterations based on synthesis feedback. In contrast, existing compiler-based methods fall short in addressing complex designs. This paper introduces RTLRewriter, an innovative framework that leverages large models to optimize RTL code. A circuit partition pipeline is utilized for fast synthesis and efficient rewriting. A multi-modal program analysis is proposed to incorporate vital visual diagram information as optimization cues. A specialized search engine is designed to identify useful optimization guides, algorithms, and code snippets that enhance the model ability to generate optimized RTL. Additionally, we introduce a Cost-aware Monte Carlo Tree Search (C-MCTS) algorithm for efficient rewriting, managing diverse retrieved contents and steering the rewriting results. Furthermore, a fast verification pipeline is proposed to reduce verification cost. To cater to the needs of both industry and academia, we propose two benchmarking suites: the Large Rewriter Benchmark, targeting complex scenarios with extensive circuit partitioning, optimization trade-offs, and verification challenges, and the Small Rewriter Benchmark, designed for a wider range of scenarios and patterns. Our comparative analysis with established compilers such as Yosys and E-graph demonstrates significant improvements, highlighting the benefits of integrating large models into the early stages of circuit design. We provide our benchmarks at https://github.com/yaoxufeng/RTLRewriter-Bench.

Shengyin Sun, Yiming Li, Xing Li et al.

Test-time scaling has emerged as a powerful paradigm for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) by allocating additional computational resources during inference. However, this paradigm is inherently inefficient due to the generation of redundant and repetitive reasoning traces, leading to significant computational overhead. Speculative decoding offers a promising avenue for mitigating this inefficiency, yet its efficacy in the structured, repetition-rich context of test-time scaling remains largely unexplored. To bridge this gap, we introduce the first comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate speculative decoding methods for accelerating LLM test-time scaling. Our benchmark provides consistent experimental protocols across representative test-time scaling paradigms (e.g., Best-of-N sampling and multi-round thinking), enabling a fair comparison of three major categories of speculative decoding: model-based, training-based, and n-gram-based methods. Extensive experiments reveal that simple n-gram-based methods effectively capture repetitive patterns, demonstrating unique potential in accelerating test-time scaling. This phenomenon demonstrates the value of integrating n-gram-based methods with model-based or training-based approaches to balance acceleration for both repetitive and diverse reasoning in test-time scaling. We hope this benchmark spurs further research on speculative decoding for test-time scaling, enabling faster and more practical reasoning in LLMs through better handling of repetitive and diverse reasoning paths.