1.1CLJan 7
Submodular Evaluation Subset Selection in Automatic Prompt OptimizationJinming Nian, Zhiyuan Peng, Hongwei Shang et al.
Automatic prompt optimization reduces manual prompt engineering, but relies on task performance measured on a small, often randomly sampled evaluation subset as its main source of feedback signal. Despite this, how to select that evaluation subset is usually treated as an implementation detail. We study evaluation subset selection for prompt optimization from a principled perspective and propose SESS, a submodular evaluation subset selection method. We frame selection as maximizing an objective set function and show that, under mild conditions, it is monotone and submodular, enabling greedy selection with theoretical guarantees. Across GSM8K, MATH, and GPQA-Diamond, submodularly selected evaluation subsets can yield better optimized prompts than random or heuristic baselines.
2.7LGSep 23, 2019
Compiler-Level Matrix Multiplication Optimization for Deep LearningHuaqing Zhang, Xiaolin Cheng, Hui Zang et al.
An important linear algebra routine, GEneral Matrix Multiplication (GEMM), is a fundamental operator in deep learning. Compilers need to translate these routines into low-level code optimized for specific hardware. Compiler-level optimization of GEMM has significant performance impact on training and executing deep learning models. However, most deep learning frameworks rely on hardware-specific operator libraries in which GEMM optimization has been mostly achieved by manual tuning, which restricts the performance on different target hardware. In this paper, we propose two novel algorithms for GEMM optimization based on the TVM framework, a lightweight Greedy Best First Search (G-BFS) method based on heuristic search, and a Neighborhood Actor Advantage Critic (N-A2C) method based on reinforcement learning. Experimental results show significant performance improvement of the proposed methods, in both the optimality of the solution and the cost of search in terms of time and fraction of the search space explored. Specifically, the proposed methods achieve 24% and 40% savings in GEMM computation time over state-of-the-art XGBoost and RNN methods, respectively, while exploring only 0.1% of the search space. The proposed approaches have potential to be applied to other operator-level optimizations.
1.5LGNov 20, 2018
Gradient-Coherent Strong Regularization for Deep Neural NetworksDae Hoon Park, Chiu Man Ho, Yi Chang et al.
Regularization plays an important role in generalization of deep neural networks, which are often prone to overfitting with their numerous parameters. L1 and L2 regularizers are common regularization tools in machine learning with their simplicity and effectiveness. However, we observe that imposing strong L1 or L2 regularization with stochastic gradient descent on deep neural networks easily fails, which limits the generalization ability of the underlying neural networks. To understand this phenomenon, we first investigate how and why learning fails when strong regularization is imposed on deep neural networks. We then propose a novel method, gradient-coherent strong regularization, which imposes regularization only when the gradients are kept coherent in the presence of strong regularization. Experiments are performed with multiple deep architectures on three benchmark data sets for image recognition. Experimental results show that our proposed approach indeed endures strong regularization and significantly improves both accuracy and compression (up to 9.9x), which could not be achieved otherwise.
0.8LGOct 19, 2018
Sequenced-Replacement Sampling for Deep LearningChiu Man Ho, Dae Hoon Park, Wei Yang et al.
We propose sequenced-replacement sampling (SRS) for training deep neural networks. The basic idea is to assign a fixed sequence index to each sample in the dataset. Once a mini-batch is randomly drawn in each training iteration, we refill the original dataset by successively adding samples according to their sequence index. Thus we carry out replacement sampling but in a batched and sequenced way. In a sense, SRS could be viewed as a way of performing "mini-batch augmentation". It is particularly useful for a task where we have a relatively small images-per-class such as CIFAR-100. Together with a longer period of initial large learning rate, it significantly improves the classification accuracy in CIFAR-100 over the current state-of-the-art results. Our experiments indicate that training deeper networks with SRS is less prone to over-fitting. In the best case, we achieve an error rate as low as 10.10%.
8.7LGMar 11, 2018
Interpreting Deep Classifier by Visual Distillation of Dark KnowledgeKai Xu, Dae Hoon Park, Chang Yi et al.
Interpreting black box classifiers, such as deep networks, allows an analyst to validate a classifier before it is deployed in a high-stakes setting. A natural idea is to visualize the deep network's representations, so as to "see what the network sees". In this paper, we demonstrate that standard dimension reduction methods in this setting can yield uninformative or even misleading visualizations. Instead, we present DarkSight, which visually summarizes the predictions of a classifier in a way inspired by notion of dark knowledge. DarkSight embeds the data points into a low-dimensional space such that it is easy to compress the deep classifier into a simpler one, essentially combining model compression and dimension reduction. We compare DarkSight against t-SNE both qualitatively and quantitatively, demonstrating that DarkSight visualizations are more informative. Our method additionally yields a new confidence measure based on dark knowledge by quantifying how unusual a given vector of predictions is.