Andrey Kravchenko

Mark Rofin, Vladislav Mikhailov, Mikhail Florinskiy et al.

The development of state-of-the-art systems in different applied areas of machine learning (ML) is driven by benchmarks, which have shaped the paradigm of evaluating generalisation capabilities from multiple perspectives. Although the paradigm is shifting towards more fine-grained evaluation across diverse tasks, the delicate question of how to aggregate the performances has received particular interest in the community. In general, benchmarks follow the unspoken utilitarian principles, where the systems are ranked based on their mean average score over task-specific metrics. Such aggregation procedure has been viewed as a sub-optimal evaluation protocol, which may have created the illusion of progress. This paper proposes Vote'n'Rank, a framework for ranking systems in multi-task benchmarks under the principles of the social choice theory. We demonstrate that our approach can be efficiently utilised to draw new insights on benchmarking in several ML sub-fields and identify the best-performing systems in research and development case studies. The Vote'n'Rank's procedures are more robust than the mean average while being able to handle missing performance scores and determine conditions under which the system becomes the winner.

Ivan Fursov, Alexey Zaytsev, Pavel Burnyshev et al.

Robustness of huge Transformer-based models for natural language processing is an important issue due to their capabilities and wide adoption. One way to understand and improve robustness of these models is an exploration of an adversarial attack scenario: check if a small perturbation of an input can fool a model. Due to the discrete nature of textual data, gradient-based adversarial methods, widely used in computer vision, are not applicable per~se. The standard strategy to overcome this issue is to develop token-level transformations, which do not take the whole sentence into account. In this paper, we propose a new black-box sentence-level attack. Our method fine-tunes a pre-trained language model to generate adversarial examples. A proposed differentiable loss function depends on a substitute classifier score and an approximate edit distance computed via a deep learning model. We show that the proposed attack outperforms competitors on a diverse set of NLP problems for both computed metrics and human evaluation. Moreover, due to the usage of the fine-tuned language model, the generated adversarial examples are hard to detect, thus current models are not robust. Hence, it is difficult to defend from the proposed attack, which is not the case for other attacks.

Ivan Fursov, Alexey Zaytsev, Nikita Kluchnikov et al.

Deep learning models suffer from a phenomenon called adversarial attacks: we can apply minor changes to the model input to fool a classifier for a particular example. The literature mostly considers adversarial attacks on models with images and other structured inputs. However, the adversarial attacks for categorical sequences can also be harmful. Successful attacks for inputs in the form of categorical sequences should address the following challenges: (1) non-differentiability of the target function, (2) constraints on transformations of initial sequences, and (3) diversity of possible problems. We handle these challenges using two black-box adversarial attacks. The first approach adopts a Monte-Carlo method and allows usage in any scenario, the second approach uses a continuous relaxation of models and target metrics, and thus allows usage of state-of-the-art methods for adversarial attacks with little additional effort. Results for money transactions, medical fraud, and NLP datasets suggest that proposed methods generate reasonable adversarial sequences that are close to original ones but fool machine learning models.