Ji‐In Kim

Gwangoo Yeo, Jiin Kim, Yujeong Choi et al.

NVIDIA's Multi-Instance GPU (MIG) is a feature that enables system designers to reconfigure one large GPU into multiple smaller GPU slices. This work characterizes this emerging GPU and evaluates its effectiveness in designing high-performance AI inference servers. Our study reveals that the data preprocessing stage of AI inference causes significant performance bottlenecks to MIG. To this end, we present PREBA, which is a hardware/software co-design targeting MIG inference servers. Our first proposition is an FPGA-based data preprocessing accelerator that unlocks the full potential of MIG with domain-specific acceleration of data preprocessing. The MIG inference server unleashed from preprocessing overheads is then augmented with our dynamic batching system that enables high-performance inference. PREBA is implemented end-to-end in real systems, providing a 3.7x improvement in throughput, 3.4x reduction in tail latency, 3.5x improvement in energy-efficiency, and 3.0x improvement in cost-efficiency.

Sunipa Dev, Emily Sheng, Jieyu Zhao et al.

Recent studies show that Natural Language Processing (NLP) technologies propagate societal biases about demographic groups associated with attributes such as gender, race, and nationality. To create interventions and mitigate these biases and associated harms, it is vital to be able to detect and measure such biases. While existing works propose bias evaluation and mitigation methods for various tasks, there remains a need to cohesively understand the biases and the specific harms they measure, and how different measures compare with each other. To address this gap, this work presents a practical framework of harms and a series of questions that practitioners can answer to guide the development of bias measures. As a validation of our framework and documentation questions, we also present several case studies of how existing bias measures in NLP -- both intrinsic measures of bias in representations and extrinsic measures of bias of downstream applications -- can be aligned with different harms and how our proposed documentation questions facilitates more holistic understanding of what bias measures are measuring.