Fred Lin

Ruixuan Wang, Fred Lin, Daniel Moore et al.

Graph neural networks (GNNs) have recently emerged as a promising learning paradigm in learning graph-structured data and have demonstrated wide success across various domains such as recommendation systems, social networks, and electronic design automation (EDA). Like other deep learning (DL) methods, GNNs are being deployed in sophisticated modern hardware systems, as well as dedicated accelerators. However, despite the popularity of GNNs and the recent efforts of bringing GNNs to hardware, the fault tolerance and resilience of GNNs have generally been overlooked. Inspired by the inherent algorithmic resilience of DL methods, this paper conducts, for the first time, a large-scale and empirical study of GNN resilience, aiming to understand the relationship between hardware faults and GNN accuracy. By developing a customized fault injection tool on top of PyTorch, we perform extensive fault injection experiments on various GNN models and application datasets. We observe that the error resilience of GNN models varies by orders of magnitude with respect to different models and application datasets. Further, we explore a low-cost error mitigation mechanism for GNN to enhance its resilience. This GNN resilience study aims to open up new directions and opportunities for future GNN accelerator design and architectural optimization.

Dongning Ma, Xun Jiao, Fred Lin et al.

Deep recommendation systems (DRS) heavily depend on specialized HPC hardware and accelerators to optimize energy, efficiency, and recommendation quality. Despite the growing number of hardware errors observed in large-scale fleet systems where DRS are deployed, the robustness of DRS has been largely overlooked. This paper presents the first systematic study of DRS robustness against hardware errors. We develop Terrorch, a user-friendly, efficient and flexible error injection framework on top of the widely-used PyTorch. We evaluate a wide range of models and datasets and observe that the DRS robustness against hardware errors is influenced by various factors from model parameters to input characteristics. We also explore 3 error mitigation methods including algorithm based fault tolerance (ABFT), activation clipping and selective bit protection (SBP). We find that applying activation clipping can recover up to 30% of the degraded AUC-ROC score, making it a promising mitigation method.

Xun Jiao, Fred Lin, Harish D. Dixit et al.

Reliability of AI systems is a fundamental concern for the successful deployment and widespread adoption of AI technologies. Unfortunately, the escalating complexity and heterogeneity of AI hardware systems make them increasingly susceptible to hardware faults, e.g., silent data corruptions (SDC), that can potentially corrupt model parameters. When this occurs during AI inference/servicing, it can potentially lead to incorrect or degraded model output for users, ultimately affecting the quality and reliability of AI services. In light of the escalating threat, it is crucial to address key questions: How vulnerable are AI models to parameter corruptions, and how do different components (such as modules, layers) of the models exhibit varying vulnerabilities to parameter corruptions? To systematically address this question, we propose a novel quantitative metric, Parameter Vulnerability Factor (PVF), inspired by architectural vulnerability factor (AVF) in computer architecture community, aiming to standardize the quantification of AI model vulnerability against parameter corruptions. We define a model parameter's PVF as the probability that a corruption in that particular model parameter will result in an incorrect output. In this paper, we present several use cases on applying PVF to three types of tasks/models during inference -- recommendation (DLRM), vision classification (CNN), and text classification (BERT), while presenting an in-depth vulnerability analysis on DLRM. PVF can provide pivotal insights to AI hardware designers in balancing the tradeoff between fault protection and performance/efficiency such as mapping vulnerable AI parameter components to well-protected hardware modules. PVF metric is applicable to any AI model and has a potential to help unify and standardize AI vulnerability/resilience evaluation practice.

Karthik Pattabiraman, Mihir Patel, Fred Lin

Failures in clusters running large-scale AI workloads can result in decreased utilization. Because the cost of a failure in such AI workloads is high (as it requires restarting the entire job from a previous checkpoint), there are many mechanisms in place to ensure that the failures are mitigated, and the impact of a failure is minimized. However, these mechanisms have many knobs and parameters, all of which must be carefully tuned based on the system and cluster's characteristics. We built AIReSim, a discrete event simulator to evaluate the different design choices during the failure, recovery, scheduling and repair processes for a cluster running a large-scale AI workload. AIReSim allows the system designer to systematically evaluate the effects of the different knobs and parameters on the overall end-to-end reliability of the system. Further, AIReSim can be used to identify which knobs or parameters are important in order to prioritize the investment of effort in improving the system. AIReSim also allows tuning of the knobs for achieving different tradeoffs in the system, as well as to consider various ``what-if'' scenarios. We present a case study of applying AIReSim for capacity planning for large-scale clusters running AI workloads.

Fred Lin, Keyur Muzumdar, Nikolay Pavlovich Laptev et al.

Root cause analysis in a large-scale production environment is challenging due to the complexity of services running across global data centers. Due to the distributed nature of a large-scale system, the various hardware, software, and tooling logs are often maintained separately, making it difficult to review the logs jointly for understanding production issues. Another challenge in reviewing the logs for identifying issues is the scale - there could easily be millions of entities, each described by hundreds of features. In this paper we present a fast dimensional analysis framework that automates the root cause analysis on structured logs with improved scalability. We first explore item-sets, i.e. combinations of feature values, that could identify groups of samples with sufficient support for the target failures using the Apriori algorithm and a subsequent improvement, FP-Growth. These algorithms were designed for frequent item-set mining and association rule learning over transactional databases. After applying them on structured logs, we select the item-sets that are most unique to the target failures based on lift. We propose pre-processing steps with the use of a large-scale real-time database and post-processing techniques and parallelism to further speed up the analysis and improve interpretability, and demonstrate that such optimization is necessary for handling large-scale production datasets. We have successfully rolled out this approach for root cause investigation purposes in a large-scale infrastructure. We also present the setup and results from multiple production use cases in this paper.