Wenge Guo

Yunpeng Xu, Wenge Guo, Zhi Wei

As a natural extension to the standard conformal prediction method, several conformal risk control methods have been recently developed and applied to various learning problems. In this work, we seek to control the conformal risk in expectation for ordinal classification tasks, which have broad applications to many real problems. For this purpose, we firstly formulated the ordinal classification task in the conformal risk control framework, and provided theoretic risk bounds of the risk control method. Then we proposed two types of loss functions specially designed for ordinal classification tasks, and developed corresponding algorithms to determine the prediction set for each case to control their risks at a desired level. We demonstrated the effectiveness of our proposed methods, and analyzed the difference between the two types of risks on three different datasets, including a simulated dataset, the UTKFace dataset and the diabetic retinopathy detection dataset.

Tareq Aldirawi, Yun Li, Wenge Guo

Conformal risk control (CRC) provides distribution-free guarantees for controlling the expected loss at a user-specified level. Existing theory typically assumes that the loss decreases monotonically with a tuning parameter that governs the size of the prediction set. This assumption is often violated in practice, where losses may behave non-monotonically due to competing objectives such as coverage and efficiency. We study CRC under non-monotone loss functions when the tuning parameter is selected from a finite grid, a common scenario in thresholding or discretized decision rules. Revisiting a known counterexample, we show that the validity of CRC without monotonicity depends on the relationship between the calibration sample size and the grid resolution. In particular, risk control can still be achieved when the calibration sample is sufficiently large relative to the grid. We provide a finite-sample guarantee for bounded losses over a grid of size $m$, showing that the excess risk above the target level $α$ is of order $\sqrt{\log(m)/n}$, where $n$ is the calibration sample size. A matching lower bound shows that this rate is minimax optimal. We also derive refined guarantees under additional structural conditions, including Lipschitz continuity and monotonicity, and extend the analysis to settings with distribution shift via importance weighting. Numerical experiments on synthetic multilabel classification and real object detection data illustrate the practical impact of non-monotonicity. Methods that account for finite-sample deviations achieve more stable risk control than approaches based on monotonicity transformations, while maintaining competitive prediction-set sizes.

Yunpeng Xu, Wenge Guo, Zhi Wei

Reliable uncertainty quantification is essential for deploying machine learning systems in high-stakes domains. Conformal prediction provides distribution-free coverage guarantees but often produces overly large prediction sets, limiting its practical utility. To address this issue, we propose \textit{Selective Conformal Risk Control} (SCRC), a unified framework that integrates conformal prediction with selective classification. The framework formulates uncertainty control as a two-stage problem: the first stage selects confident samples for prediction, and the second stage applies conformal risk control on the selected subset to construct calibrated prediction sets. We develop two algorithms under this framework. The first, SCRC-T, preserves exchangeability by computing thresholds jointly over calibration and test samples, offering exact finite-sample guarantees. The second, SCRC-I, is a calibration-only variant that provides PAC-style probabilistic guarantees while being more computational efficient. Experiments on two public datasets show that both methods achieve the target coverage and risk levels, with nearly identical performance, while SCRC-I exhibits slightly more conservative risk control but superior computational practicality. Our results demonstrate that selective conformal risk control offers an effective and efficient path toward compact, reliable uncertainty quantification.