Vetrov Dmitry

ML
h-index4
3papers
60citations
Novelty50%
AI Score27

3 Papers

20.7MLMay 1, 2019
Semi-Conditional Normalizing Flows for Semi-Supervised Learning

Andrei Atanov, Alexandra Volokhova, Arsenii Ashukha et al.

This paper proposes a semi-conditional normalizing flow model for semi-supervised learning. The model uses both labelled and unlabeled data to learn an explicit model of joint distribution over objects and labels. Semi-conditional architecture of the model allows us to efficiently compute a value and gradients of the marginal likelihood for unlabeled objects. The conditional part of the model is based on a proposed conditional coupling layer. We demonstrate performance of the model for semi-supervised classification problem on different datasets. The model outperforms the baseline approach based on variational auto-encoders on MNIST dataset.

9.0MLJul 31, 2017Code
Bayesian Sparsification of Recurrent Neural Networks

Ekaterina Lobacheva, Nadezhda Chirkova, Dmitry Vetrov

Recurrent neural networks show state-of-the-art results in many text analysis tasks but often require a lot of memory to store their weights. Recently proposed Sparse Variational Dropout eliminates the majority of the weights in a feed-forward neural network without significant loss of quality. We apply this technique to sparsify recurrent neural networks. To account for recurrent specifics we also rely on Binary Variational Dropout for RNN. We report 99.5% sparsity level on sentiment analysis task without a quality drop and up to 87% sparsity level on language modeling task with slight loss of accuracy.

1.0LGNov 28, 2016
Robust Variational Inference

Michael Figurnov, Kirill Struminsky, Dmitry Vetrov

Variational inference is a powerful tool for approximate inference. However, it mainly focuses on the evidence lower bound as variational objective and the development of other measures for variational inference is a promising area of research. This paper proposes a robust modification of evidence and a lower bound for the evidence, which is applicable when the majority of the training set samples are random noise objects. We provide experiments for variational autoencoders to show advantage of the objective over the evidence lower bound on synthetic datasets obtained by adding uninformative noise objects to MNIST and OMNIGLOT. Additionally, for the original MNIST and OMNIGLOT datasets we observe a small improvement over the non-robust evidence lower bound.