Johannes C. Paetzold

Laurin Lux, Alexander H. Berger, Moritz Knolle et al.

Region-based loss functions, such as the Dice loss, have established themselves as the de facto standard for highly class- and region-imbalanced segmentation tasks. However, models trained using region-based loss functions are notoriously miscalibrated and typically yield over-confident predictions. In medical imaging applications, such as defining tumor resection margins, this miscalibration is hindering clinical adoption. In this work, we outline a novel gradient perspective on this overconfidence and show how it affects region-based loss functions. We propose a "surgery" on the gradient vector field as a simple, yet effective intervention to mitigate calibration issues. This surgery adds a factor to the loss's partial derivative, scaling the gradient's magnitude linearly with the prediction error. In empirical evaluations across 2D and 3D medical segmentation tasks, we demonstrate the effectiveness of this intervention while maintaining high prediction accuracy when used in conjunction with any region-based loss function.

Adina Scheinfeld, Haotan Zhang, Shang Mu et al.

Light sheet fluorescence microscopy (LSM) enables high-resolution, three-dimensional (3D) imaging of biological specimens, providing rich volumetric data for studying cellular organization, pathology, and vascular networks. However, the size, dimensionality, and annotation burden of LSM data make supervised deep learning approaches costly and difficult to scale. Additionally, despite the abundance of unannotated LSM volumes, foundation models for this modality remain underexplored due to computational challenges and the complexity of volumetric representation learning. In this work, we introduce a 3D foundation model for LSM data, pretrained on a large curated collection of 3D images spanning multiple organisms, stains, and imaging protocols. We learn transferable volumetric representations by jointly optimizing for masked reconstruction and image-text alignment. The pretrained backbone drastically reduces the annotation burden, enabling efficient, few-shot adaptation for varied downstream tasks. We evaluate this approach on downstream segmentation, classification, and deblurring. Our results demonstrate consistent improvements over baselines, (1) when measured using standard evaluation metrics and (2) when rigorously assessed by domain experts. This highlights the potential of foundation model pretraining to reduce annotation requirements while improving performance across diverse LSM analysis tasks. Pretrained model weights and code for pretraining and finetuning are publicly available: https://github.com/AdinaScheinfeld/lsm_fm_public_repo.git.

Fengbei Liu, Rachit Saluja, Sunwoo Kwak et al.

Multi-objective optimization (MOO) underlies many machine learning problems, yet MOO solvers across the loss-balancing, gradient-balancing, and Pareto-based families almost universally hand their reconciled directions to Adam~\cite{kingma2015adam}. We show this coupling introduces two systematic gaps between the solver's intent and the optimizer's execution. The first is a \emph{weighting mismatch}: Adam's second-moment denominator entangles the time-varying preference vector with gradient statistics, marginalizing the preference into a history average and collapsing distinct Pareto trade-offs toward a near-uniform mixture. The second is a \emph{geometric mismatch}: Adam's adaptive metric distorts the Euclidean geometry MOO solvers assume, turning aligned objectives into apparent conflicts. To resolve both jointly, we introduce \textbf{MAdam} (Metric-Aware Multi-Objective Adam), a drop-in wrapper that leaves both solver and optimizer unchanged. MAdam preconditions the reconciled direction by the preference-conditioned curvature of the scalarized objective; on this whitened input, Adam's second moment collapses to identity, so the realized update is governed by the preference-conditioned metric. Across multi-task learning, Pareto-front recovery, physics-informed neural networks, and medical imaging, MAdam consistently improves over Adam for every solver family.

Chenjun Li, Cheng Wan, Johannes C. Paetzold

Large language models are now embedded in everyday writing workflows, making reliable AI-generated text detection important for academic integrity, content moderation, and provenance tracking. In practice, however, a detector must do more than achieve high aggregate AUROC on clean, in-distribution human and AI text: it should remain robust to attacks and adversarial rewrites, transfer to unseen generators and domains, and operate at low false-positive rates (FPR). Most existing detectors optimize a single AI/Human objective, giving the representation little incentive to learn generator, attack, or domain structure once the binary task saturates. We introduce MELD (Multi-Task Equilibrated Learning Detector), a deployable detector for AI-generated text that enriches binary detection with auxiliary supervision. MELD attaches generator-family, attack-type, and source-domain heads to a shared encoder, and balances the four losses with learned homoscedastic uncertainty weights. To improve robustness, an EMA teacher predicts on clean inputs while an attack-augmented student is distilled toward the teacher. MELD further uses a hard-negative pairwise ranking loss to enlarge the score margin between AI-generated texts and the most confusable human texts. At inference, all auxiliary heads are discarded, giving MELD the same interface and cost as a standard detector. On the public RAID leaderboard, MELD is the strongest open-source detector and is competitive with leading commercial models, especially under attack and at low FPR. Across standard held-out benchmarks, MELD matches or outperforms supervised baselines. We further introduce MELD-eval, a held-out evaluation pool built from recent chat models released by four major LLM providers. Without additional finetuning, MELD achieves 99.9% TPR at 1% FPR on MELD-eval, while many baselines degrade sharply.

Lucas Stoffl, Benedikt Wiestler, Johannes C. Paetzold

Drawing meaningful conclusions from inherently multimodal clinical data (including medical imaging) requires coordinating expertise across the clinical specialty, radiology, programming, and biostatistics. This fragmented process bottlenecks discovery. We present VERITAS (Verifiable Epistemic Reasoning for Image-Derived Hypothesis Testing via Agentic Systems), a multi-agent system that autonomously tests natural-language hypotheses on multimodal clinical datasets while producing a fully auditable evidence trail: every statistical conclusion traces through inspectable, executable outputs from analysis plan to segmentation masks to statistical code to final verdict. VERITAS decomposes the workflow into four phases handled by role-specialized agents, and introduces an epistemic evidence label framework that mechanically classifies outcomes as Supported, Refuted, Underpowered, or Invalid by jointly evaluating significance, effect direction, and study power. This distinction is critical in medical imaging, where non-significant results often reflect insufficient sample size rather than absent effects. To evaluate the system, we construct a tiered benchmark of 64 hypotheses spanning six complexity levels across cardiac (ACDC, 150 subjects) and brain glioma (UCSF-PDGM, 501 subjects) MRI. VERITAS reaches 81.4% verdict accuracy with frontier models and 71.2% with locally-hosted open-weight models (8-30B), outperforming all five single-model baselines in both classes. It also produces the highest rate of independently verifiable statistical outputs (86.6%), so even its failures remain diagnosable through artifact inspection. Structured multi-agent decomposition thus substitutes for model scale while preserving the verifiability clinical research demands.