Daniel Goldsmith

Daniel Goldsmith, M M Hassan Mahmud

Quantum machine learning (QML) is a promising early use case for quantum computing. There has been progress in the last five years from theoretical studies and numerical simulations to proof of concepts. Use cases demonstrated on contemporary quantum devices include classifying medical images and items from the Iris dataset, classifying and generating handwritten images, toxicity screening, and learning a probability distribution. Potential benefits of QML include faster training and identification of feature maps not found classically. Although, these examples lack the scale for commercial exploitation, and it may be several years before QML algorithms replace the classical solutions, QML is an exciting area. This article is written for those who already have a sound knowledge of quantum computing and now wish to gain a basic overview of the terminology and some applications of classical machine learning ready to study quantum machine learning. The reader will already understand the relevant relevant linear algebra, including Hilbert spaces, a vector space with an inner product.

Daniel Goldsmith, Kim Grauer, Yonah Shmalo

Hacks are one of the most damaging types of cryptocurrency related crime, accounting for billions of dollars in stolen funds since 2009. Professional investigators at Chainalysis have traced these stolen funds from the initial breach on an exchange to off-ramps, i.e. services where criminals are able to convert the stolen funds into fiat or other cryptocurrencies. We analyzed six hack subnetworks of bitcoin transactions known to belong to two prominent hacking groups. We analyze each hack according to eight network features, both static and temporal, and successfully classify each hack to its respective hacking group through our newly proposed method. We find that the static features, such as node balance, in degree, and out degree are not as useful in classifying the hacks into hacking groups as temporal features related to how quickly the criminals cash out. We validate our operating hypothesis that the key distinction between the two hacking groups is the acceleration with which the funds exit through terminal nodes in the subnetworks.