1.4LGJan 23Code
PyHealth 2.0: A Comprehensive Open-Source Toolkit for Accessible and Reproducible Clinical Deep LearningJohn Wu, Yongda Fan, Zhenbang Wu et al.
Difficulty replicating baselines, high computational costs, and required domain expertise create persistent barriers to clinical AI research. To address these challenges, we introduce PyHealth 2.0, an enhanced clinical deep learning toolkit that enables predictive modeling in as few as 7 lines of code. PyHealth 2.0 offers three key contributions: (1) a comprehensive toolkit addressing reproducibility and compatibility challenges by unifying 15+ datasets, 20+ clinical tasks, 25+ models, 5+ interpretability methods, and uncertainty quantification including conformal prediction within a single framework that supports diverse clinical data modalities - signals, imaging, and electronic health records - with translation of 5+ medical coding standards; (2) accessibility-focused design accommodating multimodal data and diverse computational resources with up to 39x faster processing and 20x lower memory usage, enabling work from 16GB laptops to production systems; and (3) an active open-source community of 400+ members lowering domain expertise barriers through extensive documentation, reproducible research contributions, and collaborations with academic health systems and industry partners, including multi-language support via RHealth. PyHealth 2.0 establishes an open-source foundation and community advancing accessible, reproducible healthcare AI. Available at pip install pyhealth.
2.2GTJun 16
Ergodic Deviation-Robust Equilibrium under Mirror Descent Learning in Finite GamesJoshua Steier
We introduce Ergodic Deviation-Robust Equilibrium (EDRE), a dynamics-relative equilibrium concept for repeated finite games in which agents learn via entropic mirror descent (EMD). EDRE requires three properties to hold simultaneously for the same profile and learning run: (E1) the limit profile is an $\varepsilon$-Nash equilibrium at a product distribution; (E2) along the entire learning trajectory, every fixed coalition's cumulative aggregate (summed-unilateral) deviation gain is $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{T})$ with high probability; and (E3) the limit profile is a fixed point of the EMD map, so that it is selected by the dynamics rather than merely certified as an equilibrium. We prove that the $\sqrt{T}$ deviation-regret rate is order-tight, establish existence in exact-potential games (via Nash's theorem, with a constructive proximal route under concavity) together with Lyapunov monotonicity of EMD (and pointwise convergence when the fixed-point set is a singleton), and extend the selection property to monotone polymatrix games through variational inequalities. Although a static EDRE coincides with an $\varepsilon$-Nash equilibrium, its content is dynamic: robust (positive-measure) selection under EMD excludes linearly unstable equilibria, so EDRE acts as a Nash equilibrium equipped with a dynamic certificate rather than a static refinement. On the complexity side, we show that computing EDRE is PPAD-hard in general polymatrix games and belongs to promise-PPAD for potential games. A worked $2\times 2$ coordination-game example illustrates all components of the framework. Additional results, including a bandit-feedback extension, a period-doubling route to Li-Yorke chaos for the two-strategy EMD map at large step size, a linear-program formulation for minimum-cost steering, and supporting simulations, appear in the appendices.
1.4LGMar 1
PAC Guarantees for Reinforcement Learning: Sample Complexity, Coverage, and StructureJoshua Steier
When data is scarce or mistakes are costly, average-case metrics fall short. What a practitioner needs is a guarantee: with probability at least $1-δ$, the learned policy is $\varepsilon$-close to optimal after $N$ episodes. This is the PAC promise, and between 2018 and 2025 the RL theory community made striking progress on when such promises can be kept. We survey that progress. Our organizing tool is the Coverage-Structure-Objective (CSO) framework, proposed here, which decomposes nearly every PAC sample complexity result into three factors: coverage (how data were obtained), structure (intrinsic MDP or function-class complexity), and objective (what the learner must deliver). CSO is not a theorem but an interpretive template that identifies bottlenecks and makes cross-setting comparison immediate. The technical core covers tight tabular baselines and the uniform-PAC bridge to regret; structural complexity measures (Bellman rank, witness rank, Bellman-Eluder dimension) governing learnability with function approximation; results for linear, kernel/NTK, and low-rank models; reward-free exploration as upfront coverage investment; and pessimistic offline RL where inherited coverage is the binding constraint. We provide practitioner tools: rate lookup tables indexed by CSO coordinates, Bellman residual diagnostics, coverage estimation with deployment gates, and per-episode policy certificates. A final section catalogs open problems, separating near-term targets from frontier questions where coverage, structure, and computation tangle in ways current theory cannot resolve.