Koopman-based Control of a Soft Continuum Manipulator Under Variable Loading ConditionsDaniel Bruder, Xun Fu, R. Brent Gillespie et al.
Controlling soft continuum manipulator arms is difficult due to their infinite degrees of freedom, nonlinear material properties, and large deflections under loading. This paper presents a data-driven approach to identifying soft manipulator models that enables consistent control under variable loading conditions. This is achieved by incorporating loads into a linear Koopman operator model as states and estimating their values online via an observer within the control loop. Using this approach, real-time, fully autonomous control of a pneumatically actuated soft continuum manipulator is achieved. In several trajectory following experiments, this controller is shown to be more accurate and precise than controllers based on models that are unable to explicitly account for loading. The manipulator also successfully performs pick and place of objects with unknown mass, demonstrating the efficacy of this approach in executing real-world manipulation tasks.
28.1ROFeb 7, 2019
Modeling and Control of Soft Robots Using the Koopman Operator and Model Predictive ControlDaniel Bruder, Brent Gillespie, C. David Remy et al.
Controlling soft robots with precision is a challenge due in large part to the difficulty of constructing models that are amenable to model-based control design techniques. Koopman Operator Theory offers a way to construct explicit linear dynamical models of soft robots and to control them using established model-based linear control methods. This method is data-driven, yet unlike other data-driven models such as neural networks, it yields an explicit control-oriented linear model rather than just a "black-box" input-output mapping. This work describes this Koopman-based system identification method and its application to model predictive controller design. A model and MPC controller of a pneumatic soft robot arm was constructed via the method, and its performance was evaluated over several trajectory following tasks in the real-world. On all of the tasks, the Koopman-based MPC controller outperformed a benchmark MPC controller based on a linear state-space model of the same system.