Daniel Fürst

Thilo Spinner, Daniel Fürst, Mennatallah El-Assady

Deep learning model design, development, and debugging is a process driven by best practices, guidelines, trial-and-error, and the personal experiences of model developers. At multiple stages of this process, performance and internal model data can be logged and made available. However, due to the sheer complexity and scale of this data and process, model developers often resort to evaluating their model performance based on abstract metrics like accuracy and loss. We argue that a structured analysis of data along the model's architecture and at multiple abstraction levels can considerably streamline the debugging process. Such a systematic analysis can further connect the developer's design choices to their impacts on the model behavior, facilitating the understanding, diagnosis, and refinement of deep learning models. Hence, in this paper, we (1) contribute a conceptual framework structuring the data space of deep learning experiments. Our framework, grounded in literature analysis and requirements interviews, captures design dimensions and proposes mechanisms to make this data explorable and tractable. To operationalize our framework in a ready-to-use application, we (2) present the iNNspector system. iNNspector enables tracking of deep learning experiments and provides interactive visualizations of the data on all levels of abstraction from multiple models to individual neurons. Finally, we (3) evaluate our approach with three real-world use-cases and a user study with deep learning developers and data analysts, proving its effectiveness and usability.

Furui Cheng, Vilém Zouhar, Robin Shing Moon Chan et al. · eth-zurich

Understanding the behavior of large language models (LLMs) is crucial for ensuring their safe and reliable use. However, existing explainable AI (XAI) methods for LLMs primarily rely on word-level explanations, which are often computationally inefficient and misaligned with human reasoning processes. Moreover, these methods often treat explanation as a one-time output, overlooking its inherently interactive and iterative nature. In this paper, we present LLM Analyzer, an interactive visualization system that addresses these limitations by enabling intuitive and efficient exploration of LLM behaviors through counterfactual analysis. Our system features a novel algorithm that generates fluent and semantically meaningful counterfactuals via targeted removal and replacement operations at user-defined levels of granularity. These counterfactuals are used to compute feature attribution scores, which are then integrated with concrete examples in a table-based visualization, supporting dynamic analysis of model behavior. A user study with LLM practitioners and interviews with experts demonstrate the system's usability and effectiveness, emphasizing the importance of involving humans in the explanation process as active participants rather than passive recipients.

Daniel Fürst, Matthias Miller, Daniel Keim et al.

In this paper, we bridge the gap between visualization and musicology by focusing on rhythm analysis tasks, which are tedious due to the complex visual encoding of the well-established Common Music Notation (CMN). Instead of replacing the CMN, we augment sheet music with rhythmic fingerprints to mitigate the complexity originating from the simultaneous encoding of musical features. The proposed visual design exploits music theory concepts such as the rhythm tree to facilitate the understanding of rhythmic information. Juxtaposing sheet music and the rhythmic fingerprints maintains the connection to the familiar representation. To investigate the usefulness of the rhythmic fingerprint design for identifying and comparing rhythmic patterns, we conducted a controlled user study with four experts and four novices. The results show that the rhythmic fingerprints enable novice users to recognize rhythmic patterns that only experts can identify using non-augmented sheet music.