Peter Eades

Amyra Meidiana, Seok-Hee Hong, Peter Eades

In this paper, we present new quality metrics for dynamic graph drawings. Namely, we present a new framework for change faithfulness metrics for dynamic graph drawings, which compare the ground truth change in dynamic graphs and the geometric change in drawings. More specifically, we present two specific instances, cluster change faithfulness metrics and distance change faithfulness metrics. We first validate the effectiveness of our new metrics using deformation experiments. Then we compare various graph drawing algorithms using our metrics. Our experiments confirm that the best cluster (resp. distance) faithful graph drawing algorithms are also cluster (resp. distance) change faithful.

Amyra Meidiana, Seok-Hee Hong, Peter Eades et al.

Traditionally, graph quality metrics focus on readability, but recent studies show the need for metrics which are more specific to the discovery of patterns in graphs. Cluster analysis is a popular task within graph analysis, yet there is no metric yet explicitly quantifying how well a drawing of a graph represents its cluster structure. We define a clustering quality metric measuring how well a node-link drawing of a graph represents the clusters contained in the graph. Experiments with deforming graph drawings verify that our metric effectively captures variations in the visual cluster quality of graph drawings. We then use our metric to examine how well different graph drawing algorithms visualize cluster structures in various graphs; the results con-firm that some algorithms which have been specifically designed to show cluster structures perform better than other algorithms.