2.3MEAug 1, 2024
Early Stopping Based on Repeated SignificanceEric Bax, Arundhyoti Sarkar, Alex Shtoff
For a bucket test with a single criterion for success and a fixed number of samples or testing period, requiring a $p$-value less than a specified value of $α$ for the success criterion produces statistical confidence at level $1 - α$. For multiple criteria, a Bonferroni correction that partitions $α$ among the criteria produces statistical confidence, at the cost of requiring lower $p$-values for each criterion. The same concept can be applied to decisions about early stopping, but that can lead to strict requirements for $p$-values. We show how to address that challenge by requiring criteria to be successful at multiple decision points.
1.2MEAug 5, 2024
Steady Continuous Monitoring is (Just Barely) Impossible for Tests of Unbounded LengthEric Bax, Alex Shtoff
AB testing evaluates the difference between a control and a treatment in a statistically rigorous manner. Continuous monitoring allows statistical evaluation of an AB test as it proceeds. One goal of continuous monitoring is early stopping -- confirming a statistically significant difference between control and treatment as soon as possible. Another goal is to maintain some statistical capability to discover significant differences later in the test if they cannot be confirmed earlier. These goals are in conflict -- looser requirements for early stopping leave us with more stringent ones for later. This paper shows that it is impossible to maintain a constant requirement for significance for tests that have no a priori stopping time, but we can come arbitrarily close to that goal by using tests that require repeated significant results to con rm statistically significant differences between treatment and control.