Towards Scalable Newborn Screening: Automated General Movement Assessment in Uncontrolled SettingsDaphné Chopard, Sonia Laguna, Kieran Chin-Cheong et al.
General movements (GMs) are spontaneous, coordinated body movements in infants that offer valuable insights into the developing nervous system. Assessed through the Prechtl GM Assessment (GMA), GMs are reliable predictors for neurodevelopmental disorders. However, GMA requires specifically trained clinicians, who are limited in number. To scale up newborn screening, there is a need for an algorithm that can automatically classify GMs from infant video recordings. This data poses challenges, including variability in recording length, device type, and setting, with each video coarsely annotated for overall movement quality. In this work, we introduce a tool for extracting features from these recordings and explore various machine learning techniques for automated GM classification.
19.5LGOct 8, 2021
On the Limitations of Multimodal VAEsImant Daunhawer, Thomas M. Sutter, Kieran Chin-Cheong et al.
Multimodal variational autoencoders (VAEs) have shown promise as efficient generative models for weakly-supervised data. Yet, despite their advantage of weak supervision, they exhibit a gap in generative quality compared to unimodal VAEs, which are completely unsupervised. In an attempt to explain this gap, we uncover a fundamental limitation that applies to a large family of mixture-based multimodal VAEs. We prove that the sub-sampling of modalities enforces an undesirable upper bound on the multimodal ELBO and thereby limits the generative quality of the respective models. Empirically, we showcase the generative quality gap on both synthetic and real data and present the tradeoffs between different variants of multimodal VAEs. We find that none of the existing approaches fulfills all desired criteria of an effective multimodal generative model when applied on more complex datasets than those used in previous benchmarks. In summary, we identify, formalize, and validate fundamental limitations of VAE-based approaches for modeling weakly-supervised data and discuss implications for real-world applications.
5.0LGJun 5, 2020
Generation of Differentially Private Heterogeneous Electronic Health RecordsKieran Chin-Cheong, Thomas Sutter, Julia E. Vogt
Electronic Health Records (EHRs) are commonly used by the machine learning community for research on problems specifically related to health care and medicine. EHRs have the advantages that they can be easily distributed and contain many features useful for e.g. classification problems. What makes EHR data sets different from typical machine learning data sets is that they are often very sparse, due to their high dimensionality, and often contain heterogeneous (mixed) data types. Furthermore, the data sets deal with sensitive information, which limits the distribution of any models learned using them, due to privacy concerns. For these reasons, using EHR data in practice presents a real challenge. In this work, we explore using Generative Adversarial Networks to generate synthetic, heterogeneous EHRs with the goal of using these synthetic records in place of existing data sets for downstream classification tasks. We will further explore applying differential privacy (DP) preserving optimization in order to produce DP synthetic EHR data sets, which provide rigorous privacy guarantees, and are therefore shareable and usable in the real world. The performance (measured by AUROC, AUPRC and accuracy) of our model's synthetic, heterogeneous data is very close to the original data set (within 3 - 5% of the baseline) for the non-DP model when tested in a binary classification task. Using strong $(1, 10^{-5})$ DP, our model still produces data useful for machine learning tasks, albeit incurring a roughly 17% performance penalty in our tested classification task. We additionally perform a sub-population analysis and find that our model does not introduce any bias into the synthetic EHR data compared to the baseline in either male/female populations, or the 0-18, 19-50 and 51+ age groups in terms of classification performance for either the non-DP or DP variant.