Yuli Zou

Yuli Zou, Weijian Deng, Liang Zheng

Model calibration usually requires optimizing some parameters (e.g., temperature) w.r.t an objective function (e.g., negative log-likelihood). In this paper, we report a plain, important but often neglected fact that the objective function is influenced by calibration set difficulty, i.e., the ratio of the number of incorrectly classified samples to that of correctly classified samples. If a test set has a drastically different difficulty level from the calibration set, the optimal calibration parameters of the two datasets would be different. In other words, a calibrator optimal on the calibration set would be suboptimal on the OOD test set and thus has degraded performance. With this knowledge, we propose a simple and effective method named adaptive calibrator ensemble (ACE) to calibrate OOD datasets whose difficulty is usually higher than the calibration set. Specifically, two calibration functions are trained, one for in-distribution data (low difficulty), and the other for severely OOD data (high difficulty). To achieve desirable calibration on a new OOD dataset, ACE uses an adaptive weighting method that strikes a balance between the two extreme functions. When plugged in, ACE generally improves the performance of a few state-of-the-art calibration schemes on a series of OOD benchmarks. Importantly, such improvement does not come at the cost of the in-distribution calibration accuracy.

Yuchi Liu, Lei Wang, Yuli Zou et al.

Model calibration aims to align confidence with prediction correctness. The Cross-Entropy (CE) loss is widely used for calibrator training, which enforces the model to increase confidence on the ground truth class. However, we find the CE loss has intrinsic limitations. For example, for a narrow misclassification (e.g., a test sample is wrongly classified and its softmax score on the ground truth class is 0.4), a calibrator trained by the CE loss often produces high confidence on the wrongly predicted class, which is undesirable. In this paper, we propose a new post-hoc calibration objective derived from the aim of calibration. Intuitively, the proposed objective function asks that the calibrator decrease model confidence on wrongly predicted samples and increase confidence on correctly predicted samples. Because a sample itself has insufficient ability to indicate correctness, we use its transformed versions (e.g., rotated, greyscaled, and color-jittered) during calibrator training. Trained on an in-distribution validation set and tested with isolated, individual test samples, our method achieves competitive calibration performance on both in-distribution and out-of-distribution test sets compared with the state of the art. Further, our analysis points out the difference between our method and commonly used objectives such as CE loss and Mean Square Error (MSE) loss, where the latters sometimes deviates from the calibration aim.