Dongyuan Lu

CL
h-index10
6papers
19citations
Novelty60%
AI Score36

6 Papers

CVJun 19, 2022
Low-Mid Adversarial Perturbation against Unauthorized Face Recognition System

Jiaming Zhang, Qi Yi, Dongyuan Lu et al.

In light of the growing concerns regarding the unauthorized use of facial recognition systems and its implications on individual privacy, the exploration of adversarial perturbations as a potential countermeasure has gained traction. However, challenges arise in effectively deploying this approach against unauthorized facial recognition systems due to the effects of JPEG compression on image distribution across the internet, which ultimately diminishes the efficacy of adversarial perturbations. Existing JPEG compression-resistant techniques struggle to strike a balance between resistance, transferability, and attack potency. To address these limitations, we propose a novel solution referred to as \emph{low frequency adversarial perturbation} (LFAP). This method conditions the source model to leverage low-frequency characteristics through adversarial training. To further enhance the performance, we introduce an improved \emph{low-mid frequency adversarial perturbation} (LMFAP) that incorporates mid-frequency components for an additive benefit. Our study encompasses a range of settings to replicate genuine application scenarios, including cross backbones, supervisory heads, training datasets, and testing datasets. Moreover, we evaluated our approaches on a commercial black-box API, \texttt{Face++}. The empirical results validate the cutting-edge performance achieved by our proposed solutions.

CLAug 4, 2023
You talk what you read: Understanding News Comment Behavior by Dispositional and Situational Attribution

Yuhang Wang, Yuxiang Zhang, Dongyuan Lu et al.

Many news comment mining studies are based on the assumption that comment is explicitly linked to the corresponding news. In this paper, we observed that users' comments are also heavily influenced by their individual characteristics embodied by the interaction history. Therefore, we position to understand news comment behavior by considering both the dispositional factors from news interaction history, and the situational factors from corresponding news. A three-part encoder-decoder framework is proposed to model the generative process of news comment. The resultant dispositional and situational attribution contributes to understanding user focus and opinions, which are validated in applications of reader-aware news summarization and news aspect-opinion forecasting.

LGApr 7, 2024
Inference-Time Rule Eraser: Fair Recognition via Distilling and Removing Biased Rules

Yi Zhang, Dongyuan Lu, Jitao Sang

Machine learning models often make predictions based on biased features such as gender, race, and other social attributes, posing significant fairness risks, especially in societal applications, such as hiring, banking, and criminal justice. Traditional approaches to addressing this issue involve retraining or fine-tuning neural networks with fairness-aware optimization objectives. However, these methods can be impractical due to significant computational resources, complex industrial tests, and the associated CO2 footprint. Additionally, regular users often fail to fine-tune models because they lack access to model parameters In this paper, we introduce the Inference-Time Rule Eraser (Eraser), a novel method designed to address fairness concerns by removing biased decision-making rules from deployed models during inference without altering model weights. We begin by establishing a theoretical foundation for modifying model outputs to eliminate biased rules through Bayesian analysis. Next, we present a specific implementation of Eraser that involves two stages: (1) distilling the biased rules from the deployed model into an additional patch model, and (2) removing these biased rules from the output of the deployed model during inference. Extensive experiments validate the effectiveness of our approach, showcasing its superior performance in addressing fairness concerns in AI systems.

CVApr 16, 2024
Prescribing the Right Remedy: Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models via Targeted Instruction Tuning

Rui Hu, Yahan Tu, Shuyu Wei et al.

Despite achieving outstanding performance on various cross-modal tasks, current large vision-language models (LVLMs) still suffer from hallucination issues, manifesting as inconsistencies between their generated responses and the corresponding images. Prior research has implicated that the low quality of instruction data, particularly the skewed balance between positive and negative samples, is a significant contributor to model hallucinations. Recently, researchers have proposed high-quality instruction datasets, such as LRV-Instruction, to mitigate model hallucination. Nonetheless, our investigation reveals that hallucinatory concepts from different LVLMs exhibit specificity, i.e. the distribution of hallucinatory concepts varies significantly across models. Existing datasets did not consider the hallucination specificity of different models in the design processes, thereby diminishing their efficacy in mitigating model hallucination. In this paper, we propose a targeted instruction data generation framework named DFTG that tailored to the hallucination specificity of different models. Concretely, DFTG consists of two stages: hallucination diagnosis, which extracts the necessary information from the model's responses and images for hallucination diagnosis; and targeted data generation, which generates targeted instruction data based on diagnostic results. The experimental results on hallucination benchmarks demonstrate that the targeted instruction data generated by our method are more effective in mitigating hallucinations compared to previous datasets.

CLNov 26, 2025
Self-Guided Defense: Adaptive Safety Alignment for Reasoning Models via Synthesized Guidelines

Yuhang Wang, Yanxu Zhu, Dongyuan Lu et al.

Reasoning models have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in complex reasoning tasks. However, ensuring their safety against adversarial jailbreak prompts remains a critical challenge. Due to the covert and deceptive nature of such prompts, they can often evade built-in safety mechanisms and lead to the generation of harmful content. This underscores the need for an adaptive safety alignment approach that enables models to autonomously reinforce their defenses in response to adversarial inputs. This paper introduces the Synthesized Guideline-based Adaptive Safety Alignment (SGASA) framework, which internalizes model-generated safety guidelines to strengthen models' ability to enhance robustness against harmful adversarial prompts while minimizing unnecessary refusals of benign requests. SGASA consists of two key stages: Data Pre-synthesis, which generates safety guidelines and augmented prompts; and Alignment Fine-tuning, which leverages Supervised Fine-tuning (SFT) and Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) to embed these guidelines into the model. Extensive experiments across multiple datasets demonstrate that SGASA significantly improves model safety, validating its adaptive and scalable effectiveness.

LGNov 19, 2020
An Experimental Study of Semantic Continuity for Deep Learning Models

Shangxi Wu, Dongyuan Lu, Xian Zhao et al.

Deep learning models suffer from the problem of semantic discontinuity: small perturbations in the input space tend to cause semantic-level interference to the model output. We argue that the semantic discontinuity results from these inappropriate training targets and contributes to notorious issues such as adversarial robustness, interpretability, etc. We first conduct data analysis to provide evidence of semantic discontinuity in existing deep learning models, and then design a simple semantic continuity constraint which theoretically enables models to obtain smooth gradients and learn semantic-oriented features. Qualitative and quantitative experiments prove that semantically continuous models successfully reduce the use of non-semantic information, which further contributes to the improvement in adversarial robustness, interpretability, model transfer, and machine bias.