Chris Lin

Chris Lin, Ian Covert, Su-In Lee

To explain predictions made by complex machine learning models, many feature attribution methods have been developed that assign importance scores to input features. Some recent work challenges the robustness of these methods by showing that they are sensitive to input and model perturbations, while other work addresses this issue by proposing robust attribution methods. However, previous work on attribution robustness has focused primarily on gradient-based feature attributions, whereas the robustness of removal-based attribution methods is not currently well understood. To bridge this gap, we theoretically characterize the robustness properties of removal-based feature attributions. Specifically, we provide a unified analysis of such methods and derive upper bounds for the difference between intact and perturbed attributions, under settings of both input and model perturbations. Our empirical results on synthetic and real-world data validate our theoretical results and demonstrate their practical implications, including the ability to increase attribution robustness by improving the model's Lipschitz regularity.

Chris Lin, Hugh Chen, Chanwoo Kim et al.

Despite the widespread use of unsupervised models, very few methods are designed to explain them. Most explanation methods explain a scalar model output. However, unsupervised models output representation vectors, the elements of which are not good candidates to explain because they lack semantic meaning. To bridge this gap, recent works defined a scalar explanation output: a dot product-based similarity in the representation space to the sample being explained (i.e., an explicand). Although this enabled explanations of unsupervised models, the interpretation of this approach can still be opaque because similarity to the explicand's representation may not be meaningful to humans. To address this, we propose contrastive corpus similarity, a novel and semantically meaningful scalar explanation output based on a reference corpus and a contrasting foil set of samples. We demonstrate that contrastive corpus similarity is compatible with many post-hoc feature attribution methods to generate COntrastive COrpus Attributions (COCOA) and quantitatively verify that features important to the corpus are identified. We showcase the utility of COCOA in two ways: (i) we draw insights by explaining augmentations of the same image in a contrastive learning setting (SimCLR); and (ii) we perform zero-shot object localization by explaining the similarity of image representations to jointly learned text representations (CLIP).

Soham Gadgil, Chris Lin, Su-In Lee

Steering vectors have emerged as a lightweight and effective approach for aligning large language models (LLMs) at inference time, enabling modulation over model behaviors by shifting LLM representations towards a target behavior. However, existing methods typically apply steering vectors at a globally fixed layer, implicitly assuming that the optimal intervention layer is invariant across inputs. We argue that this assumption is fundamentally limited, as representations relevant to a target behavior can be encoded at different layers depending on the input. Theoretically, we show that different inputs can require steering at different layers to achieve alignment with a desirable model behavior. We also provide empirical evidence that the optimal steering layer varies substantially across inputs in practice. Motivated by these observations, we introduce Where to Steer (W2S), a framework that adaptively selects the intervention layer conditioned on the input, by learning a mapping from input embeddings to optimal steering layers. Across multiple LLMs and alignment behaviors, W2S consistently outperforms fixed-layer baselines, with improvements in both in-distribution and out-of-distribution settings. Our findings highlight the importance of input-dependent control in LLM alignment and demonstrate that adaptive layer selection is a key design dimension missing in the current methodology of steering vectors.

Chris Lin, Gerald J. Sun, Krishna C. Bulusu et al.

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are versatile, powerful machine learning methods that enable graph structure and feature representation learning, and have applications across many domains. For applications critically requiring interpretation, attention-based GNNs have been leveraged. However, these approaches either rely on specific model architectures or lack a joint consideration of graph structure and node features in their interpretation. Here we present a model-agnostic framework for interpreting important graph structure and node features, Graph neural networks Including SparSe inTerpretability (GISST). With any GNN model, GISST combines an attention mechanism and sparsity regularization to yield an important subgraph and node feature subset related to any graph-based task. Through a single self-attention layer, a GISST model learns an importance probability for each node feature and edge in the input graph. By including these importance probabilities in the model loss function, the probabilities are optimized end-to-end and tied to the task-specific performance. Furthermore, GISST sparsifies these importance probabilities with entropy and L1 regularization to reduce noise in the input graph topology and node features. Our GISST models achieve superior node feature and edge explanation precision in synthetic datasets, as compared to alternative interpretation approaches. Moreover, our GISST models are able to identify important graph structure in real-world datasets. We demonstrate in theory that edge feature importance and multiple edge types can be considered by incorporating them into the GISST edge probability computation. By jointly accounting for topology, node features, and edge features, GISST inherently provides simple and relevant interpretations for any GNN models and tasks.