Tzu-hsun Feng

CL
h-index32
6papers
135citations
Novelty40%
AI Score24

6 Papers

CLOct 16, 2022
SUPERB @ SLT 2022: Challenge on Generalization and Efficiency of Self-Supervised Speech Representation Learning

Tzu-hsun Feng, Annie Dong, Ching-Feng Yeh et al. · meta-ai, mit

We present the SUPERB challenge at SLT 2022, which aims at learning self-supervised speech representation for better performance, generalization, and efficiency. The challenge builds upon the SUPERB benchmark and implements metrics to measure the computation requirements of self-supervised learning (SSL) representation and to evaluate its generalizability and performance across the diverse SUPERB tasks. The SUPERB benchmark provides comprehensive coverage of popular speech processing tasks, from speech and speaker recognition to audio generation and semantic understanding. As SSL has gained interest in the speech community and showed promising outcomes, we envision the challenge to uplevel the impact of SSL techniques by motivating more practical designs of techniques beyond task performance. We summarize the results of 14 submitted models in this paper. We also discuss the main findings from those submissions and the future directions of SSL research.

ASFeb 24, 2023
Ensemble knowledge distillation of self-supervised speech models

Kuan-Po Huang, Tzu-hsun Feng, Yu-Kuan Fu et al.

Distilled self-supervised models have shown competitive performance and efficiency in recent years. However, there is a lack of experience in jointly distilling multiple self-supervised speech models. In our work, we performed Ensemble Knowledge Distillation (EKD) on various self-supervised speech models such as HuBERT, RobustHuBERT, and WavLM. We tried two different aggregation techniques, layerwise-average and layerwise-concatenation, to the representations of different teacher models and found that the former was more effective. On top of that, we proposed a multiple prediction head method for student models to predict different layer outputs of multiple teacher models simultaneously. The experimental results show that our method improves the performance of the distilled models on four downstream speech processing tasks, Phoneme Recognition, Speaker Identification, Emotion Recognition, and Automatic Speech Recognition in the hidden-set track of the SUPERB benchmark.

CLNov 17, 2022
Is Smaller Always Faster? Tradeoffs in Compressing Self-Supervised Speech Transformers

Tzu-Quan Lin, Tsung-Huan Yang, Chun-Yao Chang et al.

Transformer-based self-supervised models have achieved remarkable success in speech processing, but their large size and high inference cost present significant challenges for real-world deployment. While numerous compression techniques have been proposed, inconsistent evaluation metrics make it difficult to compare their practical effectiveness. In this work, we conduct a comprehensive study of four common compression methods, including weight pruning, head pruning, low-rank approximation, and knowledge distillation on self-supervised speech Transformers. We evaluate each method under three key metrics: parameter count, multiply-accumulate operations, and real-time factor. Results show that each method offers distinct advantages. In addition, we contextualize recent compression techniques, comparing DistilHuBERT, FitHuBERT, LightHuBERT, ARMHuBERT, and STaRHuBERT under the same framework, offering practical guidance on compression for deployment.

LGMay 30, 2022
Searching for the Essence of Adversarial Perturbations

Dennis Y. Menn, Tzu-hsun Feng, Hung-yi Lee

Neural networks have demonstrated state-of-the-art performance in various machine learning fields. However, the introduction of malicious perturbations in input data, known as adversarial examples, has been shown to deceive neural network predictions. This poses potential risks for real-world applications such as autonomous driving and text identification. In order to mitigate these risks, a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms underlying adversarial examples is essential. In this study, we demonstrate that adversarial perturbations contain human-recognizable information, which is the key conspirator responsible for a neural network's incorrect prediction, in contrast to the widely held belief that human-unidentifiable characteristics play a critical role in fooling a network. This concept of human-recognizable characteristics enables us to explain key features of adversarial perturbations, including their existence, transferability among different neural networks, and increased interpretability for adversarial training. We also uncover two unique properties of adversarial perturbations that deceive neural networks: masking and generation. Additionally, a special class, the complementary class, is identified when neural networks classify input images. The presence of human-recognizable information in adversarial perturbations allows researchers to gain insight into the working principles of neural networks and may lead to the development of techniques for detecting and defending against adversarial attacks.

LGSep 28, 2023
Investigating Human-Identifiable Features Hidden in Adversarial Perturbations

Dennis Y. Menn, Tzu-hsun Feng, Sriram Vishwanath et al.

Neural networks perform exceedingly well across various machine learning tasks but are not immune to adversarial perturbations. This vulnerability has implications for real-world applications. While much research has been conducted, the underlying reasons why neural networks fall prey to adversarial attacks are not yet fully understood. Central to our study, which explores up to five attack algorithms across three datasets, is the identification of human-identifiable features in adversarial perturbations. Additionally, we uncover two distinct effects manifesting within human-identifiable features. Specifically, the masking effect is prominent in untargeted attacks, while the generation effect is more common in targeted attacks. Using pixel-level annotations, we extract such features and demonstrate their ability to compromise target models. In addition, our findings indicate a notable extent of similarity in perturbations across different attack algorithms when averaged over multiple models. This work also provides insights into phenomena associated with adversarial perturbations, such as transferability and model interpretability. Our study contributes to a deeper understanding of the underlying mechanisms behind adversarial attacks and offers insights for the development of more resilient defense strategies for neural networks.

ASApr 15, 2024
A Large-Scale Evaluation of Speech Foundation Models

Shu-wen Yang, Heng-Jui Chang, Zili Huang et al. · meta-ai, mit

The foundation model paradigm leverages a shared foundation model to achieve state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance for various tasks, requiring minimal downstream-specific modeling and data annotation. This approach has proven crucial in the field of Natural Language Processing (NLP). However, the speech processing community lacks a similar setup to explore the paradigm systematically. In this work, we establish the Speech processing Universal PERformance Benchmark (SUPERB) to study the effectiveness of the paradigm for speech. We propose a unified multi-tasking framework to address speech processing tasks in SUPERB using a frozen foundation model followed by task-specialized, lightweight prediction heads. Combining our results with community submissions, we verify that the foundation model paradigm is promising for speech, and our multi-tasking framework is simple yet effective, as the best-performing foundation model shows competitive generalizability across most SUPERB tasks. For reproducibility and extensibility, we have developed a long-term maintained platform that enables deterministic benchmarking, allows for result sharing via an online leaderboard, and promotes collaboration through a community-driven benchmark database to support new development cycles. Finally, we conduct a series of analyses to offer an in-depth understanding of SUPERB and speech foundation models, including information flows across tasks inside the models, the correctness of the weighted-sum benchmarking protocol and the statistical significance and robustness of the benchmark.