Yili Zhao

Zhiyong He, Dewen Guo, Minghao Guo et al.

Simulating large-scale articulated assemblies poses a significant challenge due to the numerical stiffness and geometric complexity of jointed structures. Conventional rigid body solvers struggle with the high nonlinearity induced by rotation parameterization. This difficulty becomes more pronounced for multiple two-way-coupled bodies. This paper introduces a novel framework that leverages the linear kinematic mapping of Affine Body Dynamics (ABD). As ABD targets near-rigid objects, the constitutive variations of different materials become negligible, which justifies a co-rotational approach to isolate geometric nonlinearities of the system. This insight enables the use of constant system matrices that can be pre-factorized throughout the simulation, even with fully implicit integration schemes. To manage the high DOF counts of large-scale systems, we map primal body coordinates onto a compact dual space defined by minimal joint degrees of freedom. By solving the resulting KKT systems, our method ensures exact constraint enforcement and physically accurate motion propagation. We provide a suite of specialized solvers tailored for diverse joint topologies, including chains, trees, closed loops, and irregular networks. Experimental results show that our approach achieves interactive rates for systems with hundreds of thousands of bodies on a single CPU core, while maintaining excellent stability at large time steps.

Andrew Szot, Alex Clegg, Eric Undersander et al.

We introduce Habitat 2.0 (H2.0), a simulation platform for training virtual robots in interactive 3D environments and complex physics-enabled scenarios. We make comprehensive contributions to all levels of the embodied AI stack - data, simulation, and benchmark tasks. Specifically, we present: (i) ReplicaCAD: an artist-authored, annotated, reconfigurable 3D dataset of apartments (matching real spaces) with articulated objects (e.g. cabinets and drawers that can open/close); (ii) H2.0: a high-performance physics-enabled 3D simulator with speeds exceeding 25,000 simulation steps per second (850x real-time) on an 8-GPU node, representing 100x speed-ups over prior work; and, (iii) Home Assistant Benchmark (HAB): a suite of common tasks for assistive robots (tidy the house, prepare groceries, set the table) that test a range of mobile manipulation capabilities. These large-scale engineering contributions allow us to systematically compare deep reinforcement learning (RL) at scale and classical sense-plan-act (SPA) pipelines in long-horizon structured tasks, with an emphasis on generalization to new objects, receptacles, and layouts. We find that (1) flat RL policies struggle on HAB compared to hierarchical ones; (2) a hierarchy with independent skills suffers from 'hand-off problems', and (3) SPA pipelines are more brittle than RL policies.