Minseok Kim

h-index9
2papers
434citations

2 Papers

4.9CLFeb 28, 2025
Aligning Extraction and Generation for Robust Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Hwanjun Song, Jeonghwan Choi, Minseok Kim

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enhances LLMs with external knowledge, yet generation remains vulnerable to retrieval-induced noise and uncertain placement of relevant chunks, often causing hallucinations. We present Ext2Gen, an extract-then-generate framework that strengthens LLMs via joint evidence selection and answer generation, dynamically identifying query-relevant content while suppressing noise, thereby removing the need for any independent pre-generation compression module. Optimized through preference alignment with well-curated pairwise feedback, Ext2Gen produces accurate and faithful answers even under noisy or imprecise retrieval. Experiments demonstrate that it substantially enhances the robustness of the generation backbone and yields greater performance gains than methods relying on independent compression models, e.g., Recomp, CompAct, EXIT). It further benefits from improved retrieval techniques such as query rewriting, underscoring that generation-side enhancements address limitations that retrieval alone cannot overcome.

14.6LGNov 19, 2019
How does Early Stopping Help Generalization against Label Noise?

Hwanjun Song, Minseok Kim, Dongmin Park et al.

Noisy labels are very common in real-world training data, which lead to poor generalization on test data because of overfitting to the noisy labels. In this paper, we claim that such overfitting can be avoided by "early stopping" training a deep neural network before the noisy labels are severely memorized. Then, we resume training the early stopped network using a "maximal safe set," which maintains a collection of almost certainly true-labeled samples at each epoch since the early stop point. Putting them all together, our novel two-phase training method, called Prestopping, realizes noise-free training under any type of label noise for practical use. Extensive experiments using four image benchmark data sets verify that our method significantly outperforms four state-of-the-art methods in test error by 0.4-8.2 percent points under existence of real-world noise.