P. M. Abhinav

Abhinav P. M., SujayKumar Reddy M, Oswald Christopher

This project, titled "Machine Translation with Large Language Models: Decoder-only vs. Encoder-Decoder," aims to develop a multilingual machine translation (MT) model. Focused on Indian regional languages, especially Telugu, Tamil, and Malayalam, the model seeks to enable accurate and contextually appropriate translations across diverse language pairs. By comparing Decoder-only and Encoder-Decoder architectures, the project aims to optimize translation quality and efficiency, advancing cross-linguistic communication tools.The primary objective is to develop a model capable of delivering high-quality translations that are accurate and contextually appropriate. By leveraging large language models, specifically comparing the effectiveness of Decoder-only and Encoder-Decoder architectures, the project seeks to optimize translation performance and efficiency across multilingual contexts. Through rigorous experimentation and analysis, this project aims to advance the field of machine translation, contributing valuable insights into the effectiveness of different model architectures and paving the way for enhanced cross-linguistic communication tools.

Abhinav P M, Ojasva Saxena, Oswald C et al.

The extent to which large language models (LLMs) can perform culturally grounded reasoning across non-English languages remains underexplored. This paper examines the reasoning and self-assessment abilities of LLMs across seven major Indian languages-Bengali, Gujarati, Hindi, Kannada, Malayalam, Tamil, and Telugu. We introduce a multilingual riddle dataset combining traditional riddles with context-reconstructed variants and evaluate five LLMs-Gemini 2.5 Pro, Gemini 2.5 Flash, Mistral-Saba, LLaMA 4 Scout, and LLaMA 4 Maverick-under seven prompting strategies. In the first stage, we assess riddle-solving performance and find that while Gemini 2.5 Pro performs best overall, few-shot methods yield only marginal gains, and accuracy varies notably across languages. In the second stage, we conduct a self-evaluation experiment to measure reasoning consistency. The results reveal a key finding: a model's initial accuracy is inversely correlated with its ability to identify its own mistakes. Top-performing models such as Gemini 2.5 Pro are overconfident (4.34% True Negative Rate), whereas lower-performing models like LLaMA 4 Scout are substantially more self-aware (42.09% True Negative Rate). These results point to clear gaps in multilingual reasoning and highlight the need for models that not only reason effectively but also recognize their own limitations.