Haoyang Chen

Liangxuan Guo, Haoyang Chen, Yang Chen et al.

A remarkable capability of the human brain is to form more abstract conceptual representations from sensorimotor experiences and flexibly apply them independent of direct sensory inputs. However, the computational mechanism underlying this ability remains poorly understood. Here, we present a dual-module neural network framework, the CATS Net, to bridge this gap. Our model consists of a concept-abstraction module that extracts low-dimensional conceptual representations, and a task-solving module that performs visual judgement tasks under the hierarchical gating control of the formed concepts. The system develops transferable semantic structure based on concept representations that enable cross-network knowledge transfer through conceptual communication. Model-brain fitting analyses reveal that these emergent concept spaces align with both neurocognitive semantic model and brain response structures in the human ventral occipitotemporal cortex, while the gating mechanisms mirror that in the semantic control brain network. This work establishes a unified computational framework that can offer mechanistic insights for understanding human conceptual cognition and engineering artificial systems with human-like conceptual intelligence.

Haoyang Chen, Kumiko Tanaka-Ishii

We explore the applicability of text-to-code to solve real-world problems that are typically solved in natural language, such as legal judgment and medical QA. Unlike previous works, our approach leverages the explicit reasoning provided by program generation. We present ICRAG, a framework that transforms natural language into executable programs through iterative refinement using external knowledge from domain resources and GitHub. Across 13 benchmarks, ICRAG achieves up to 161.1\% relative improvement. We provide a detailed analysis of the generated code and the impact of external knowledge, and we discuss the limitations of applying text-to-code approaches to real-world natural language tasks.

Haoyang Chen, Kumiko Tanaka-Ishii

We present a comparative analysis of text complexity across domains using scale-free metrics. We quantify linguistic complexity via Heaps' exponent $β$ (vocabulary growth), Taylor's exponent $α$ (word-frequency fluctuation scaling), compression rate $r$ (redundancy), and entropy. Our corpora span three domains: legal documents (statutes, cases, deeds) as a specialized domain, general natural language texts (literature, Wikipedia), and AI-generated (GPT) text. We find that legal texts exhibit slower vocabulary growth (lower $β$) and higher term consistency (higher $α$) than general texts. Within legal domain, statutory codes have the lowest $β$ and highest $α$, reflecting strict drafting conventions, while cases and deeds show higher $β$ and lower $α$. In contrast, GPT-generated text shows the statistics more aligning with general language patterns. These results demonstrate that legal texts exhibit domain-specific structures and complexities, which current generative models do not fully replicate.