Yapeng Li

h-index3
2papers
13citations

2 Papers

6.0LGMar 25
KCLNet: Electrically Equivalence-Oriented Graph Representation Learning for Analog Circuits

Peng Xu, Yapeng Li, Tinghuan Chen et al.

Digital circuits representation learning has made remarkable progress in the electronic design automation domain, effectively supporting critical tasks such as testability analysis and logic reasoning. However, representation learning for analog circuits remains challenging due to their continuous electrical characteristics compared to the discrete states of digital circuits. This paper presents a direct current (DC) electrically equivalent-oriented analog representation learning framework, named \textbf{KCLNet}. It comprises an asynchronous graph neural network structure with electrically-simulated message passing and a representation learning method inspired by Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL). This method maintains the orderliness of the circuit embedding space by enforcing the equality of the sum of outgoing and incoming current embeddings at each depth, which significantly enhances the generalization ability of circuit embeddings. KCLNet offers a novel and effective solution for analog circuit representation learning with electrical constraints preserved. Experimental results demonstrate that our method achieves significant performance in a variety of downstream tasks, e.g., analog circuit classification, subcircuit detection, and circuit edit distance prediction.

1.4LGJan 19
A Comprehensive Evaluation of LLM Reasoning: From Single-Model to Multi-Agent Paradigms

Yapeng Li, Jiakuo Yu, Zhixin Liu et al.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as reasoning systems, where reasoning paradigms - such as Chain-of-Thought (CoT) and multi-agent systems (MAS) - play a critical role, yet their relative effectiveness and cost-accuracy trade-offs remain poorly understood. In this work, we conduct a comprehensive and unified evaluation of reasoning paradigms, spanning direct single-model generation, CoT-augmented single-model reasoning, and representative MAS workflows, characterizing their reasoning performance across a diverse suite of closed-form benchmarks. Beyond overall performance, we probe role-specific capability demands in MAS using targeted role isolation analyses, and analyze cost-accuracy trade-offs to identify which MAS workflows offer a favorable balance between cost and accuracy, and which incur prohibitive overhead for marginal gains. We further introduce MIMeBench, a new open-ended benchmark that targets two foundational yet underexplored semantic capabilities - semantic abstraction and contrastive discrimination - thereby providing an alternative evaluation axis beyond closed-form accuracy and enabling fine-grained assessment of semantic competence that is difficult to capture with existing benchmarks. Our results show that increased structural complexity does not consistently lead to improved reasoning performance, with its benefits being highly dependent on the properties and suitability of the reasoning paradigm itself. The codes are released at https://gitcode.com/HIT1920/OpenLLMBench.