Wenwei Gu

Wenwei Gu, Jinyang Liu, Zhuangbin Chen et al.

Cloud systems are susceptible to performance issues, which may cause service-level agreement violations and financial losses. In current practice, crucial metrics are monitored periodically to provide insight into the operational status of components. Identifying performance issues is often formulated as an anomaly detection problem, which is tackled by analyzing each metric independently. However, this approach overlooks the complex dependencies existing among cloud components. Some graph neural network-based methods take both temporal and relational information into account, however, the correlation violations in the metrics that serve as indicators of underlying performance issues are difficult for them to identify. Furthermore, a large volume of components in a cloud system results in a vast array of noisy metrics. This complexity renders it impractical for engineers to fully comprehend the correlations, making it challenging to identify performance issues accurately. To address these limitations, we propose Identifying Performance Issues based on Relational-Temporal Features (ISOLATE ), a learning-based approach that leverages both the relational and temporal features of metrics to identify performance issues. In particular, it adopts a graph neural network with attention to characterizing the relations among metrics and extracts long-term and multi-scale temporal patterns using a GRU and a convolution network, respectively. The learned graph attention weights can be further used to localize the correlation-violated metrics. Moreover, to relieve the impact of noisy data, ISOLATE utilizes a positive unlabeled learning strategy that tags pseudo-labels based on a small portion of confirmed negative examples. Extensive evaluation on both public and industrial datasets shows that ISOLATE outperforms all baseline models with 0.945 F1-score and 0.920 Hit rate@3.

Jinyang Liu, Wenwei Gu, Zhuangbin Chen et al.

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are essential time-series metrics for ensuring the reliability and stability of many software systems. They faithfully record runtime states to facilitate the understanding of anomalous system behaviors and provide informative clues for engineers to pinpoint the root causes. The unprecedented scale and complexity of modern software systems, however, make the volume of KPIs explode. Consequently, many traditional methods of KPI anomaly detection become impractical, which serves as a catalyst for the fast development of machine learning-based solutions in both academia and industry. However, there is currently a lack of rigorous comparison among these KPI anomaly detection methods, and re-implementation demands a non-trivial effort. Moreover, we observe that different works adopt independent evaluation processes with different metrics. Some of them may not fully reveal the capability of a model and some are creating an illusion of progress. To better understand the characteristics of different KPI anomaly detectors and address the evaluation issue, in this paper, we provide a comprehensive review and evaluation of twelve state-of-the-art methods, and propose a novel metric called salience. Particularly, the selected methods include five traditional machine learning-based methods and seven deep learning-based methods. These methods are evaluated with five multivariate KPI datasets that are publicly available. A unified toolkit with easy-to-use interfaces is also released. We report the benchmark results in terms of accuracy, salience, efficiency, and delay, which are of practical importance for industrial deployment. We believe our work can contribute as a basis for future academic research and industrial application.

Yun Peng, Shuqing Li, Wenwei Gu et al.

Application Programming Interfaces (APIs), which encapsulate the implementation of specific functions as interfaces, greatly improve the efficiency of modern software development. As numbers of APIs spring up nowadays, developers can hardly be familiar with all the APIs, and usually need to search for appropriate APIs for usage. So lots of efforts have been devoted to improving the API recommendation task. However, it has been increasingly difficult to gauge the performance of new models due to the lack of a uniform definition of the task and a standardized benchmark. For example, some studies regard the task as a code completion problem; while others recommend relative APIs given natural language queries. To reduce the challenges and better facilitate future research, in this paper, we revisit the API recommendation task and aim at benchmarking the approaches. Specifically, the paper groups the approaches into two categories according to the task definition, i.e., query-based API recommendation and code-based API recommendation. We study 11 recently-proposed approaches along with 4 widely-used IDEs. One benchmark named as APIBench is then built for the two respective categories of approaches. Based on APIBench, we distill some actionable insights and challenges for API recommendation. We also achieve some implications and directions for improving the performance of recommending APIs, including data source selection, appropriate query reformulation, low resource setting, and cross-domain adaptation.

Zhuangbin Chen, Jinyang Liu, Wenwei Gu et al.

Logs have been an imperative resource to ensure the reliability and continuity of many software systems, especially large-scale distributed systems. They faithfully record runtime information to facilitate system troubleshooting and behavior understanding. Due to the large scale and complexity of modern software systems, the volume of logs has reached an unprecedented level. Consequently, for log-based anomaly detection, conventional manual inspection methods or even traditional machine learning-based methods become impractical, which serve as a catalyst for the rapid development of deep learning-based solutions. However, there is currently a lack of rigorous comparison among the representative log-based anomaly detectors that resort to neural networks. Moreover, the re-implementation process demands non-trivial efforts, and bias can be easily introduced. To better understand the characteristics of different anomaly detectors, in this paper, we provide a comprehensive review and evaluation of five popular neural networks used by six state-of-the-art methods. Particularly, four of the selected methods are unsupervised, and the remaining two are supervised. These methods are evaluated with two publicly available log datasets, which contain nearly 16 million log messages and 0.4 million anomaly instances in total. We believe our work can serve as a basis in this field and contribute to future academic research and industrial applications.