7.1LGJul 10
On-Device Adaptive Battery Power Prediction for Electric VehiclesAvik Bhatnagar, Anton Paule, Tobias Schuermann et al.
Adaptive power management in Electric Vehicles (EVs) requires accurate power prediction. Although deep learning models have emerged as highly effective for time-series forecasting in this domain, their performance is prone to degradation when exposed to data with distributions different from the training data. We introduce a novel approach that enables on-device learning in resource-constrained EV systems to continuously adapt pretrained battery prediction models to new, unseen data. We leverage existing pretrained models by transforming them into adaptable versions that retain critical hyperparameter knowledge from their initial training. We comprehensively investigate both online and offline model adaptation strategies. Our results demonstrate significant improvements in forecasting performance across various models and time horizons, achieving mean absolute error reductions of up to 7.49\% and 14.88\% with online and offline adaptation techniques, respectively. This study highlights the substantial benefit of on-device adaptation, resulting in enhanced battery power predictions than unadapted model deployments in real-world EV scenarios.
4.6LGAug 1, 2024
Low-Power Vibration-Based Predictive Maintenance for Industry 4.0 using Neural Networks: A SurveyAlexandru Vasilache, Sven Nitzsche, Daniel Floegel et al.
The advancements in smart sensors for Industry 4.0 offer ample opportunities for low-powered predictive maintenance and condition monitoring. However, traditional approaches in this field rely on processing in the cloud, which incurs high costs in energy and storage. This paper investigates the potential of neural networks for low-power on-device computation of vibration sensor data for predictive maintenance. We review the literature on Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) and Artificial Neuronal Networks (ANNs) for vibration-based predictive maintenance by analyzing datasets, data preprocessing, network architectures, and hardware implementations. Our findings suggest that no satisfactory standard benchmark dataset exists for evaluating neural networks in predictive maintenance tasks. Furthermore frequency domain transformations are commonly employed for preprocessing. SNNs mainly use shallow feed forward architectures, whereas ANNs explore a wider range of models and deeper networks. Finally, we highlight the need for future research on hardware implementations of neural networks for low-power predictive maintenance applications and the development of a standardized benchmark dataset.