Andrew Michelson

Sayantan Kumar, Sean Yu, Andrew Michelson et al.

Objective: We aimed to develop and validate a novel multimodal framework HiMAL (Hierarchical, Multi-task Auxiliary Learning) framework, for predicting cognitive composite functions as auxiliary tasks that estimate the longitudinal risk of transition from Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) to Alzheimer Disease (AD). Methods: HiMAL utilized multimodal longitudinal visit data including imaging features, cognitive assessment scores, and clinical variables from MCI patients in the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset, to predict at each visit if an MCI patient will progress to AD within the next 6 months. Performance of HiMAL was compared with state-of-the-art single-task and multi-task baselines using area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC) and precision recall curve (AUPRC) metrics. An ablation study was performed to assess the impact of each input modality on model performance. Additionally, longitudinal explanations regarding risk of disease progression were provided to interpret the predicted cognitive decline. Results: Out of 634 MCI patients (mean [IQR] age : 72.8 [67-78], 60% men), 209 (32%) progressed to AD. HiMAL showed better prediction performance compared to all single-modality singe-task baselines (AUROC = 0.923 [0.915-0.937]; AUPRC= 0.623 [0.605-0.644]; all p<0.05). Ablation analysis highlighted that imaging and cognition scores with maximum contribution towards prediction of disease progression. Discussion: Clinically informative model explanations anticipate cognitive decline 6 months in advance, aiding clinicians in future disease progression assessment. HiMAL relies on routinely collected EHR variables for proximal (6 months) prediction of AD onset, indicating its translational potential for point-of-care monitoring and managing of high-risk patients.

Sayantan Kumar, Sean C. Yu, Thomas Kannampallil et al.

Complex deep learning models show high prediction tasks in various clinical prediction tasks but their inherent complexity makes it more challenging to explain model predictions for clinicians and healthcare providers. Existing research on explainability of deep learning models in healthcare have two major limitations: using post-hoc explanations and using raw clinical variables as units of explanation, both of which are often difficult for human interpretation. In this work, we designed a self-explaining deep learning framework using the expert-knowledge driven clinical concepts or intermediate features as units of explanation. The self-explaining nature of our proposed model comes from generating both explanations and predictions within the same architectural framework via joint training. We tested our proposed approach on a publicly available Electronic Health Records (EHR) dataset for predicting patient mortality in the ICU. In order to analyze the performance-interpretability trade-off, we compared our proposed model with a baseline having the same set-up but without the explanation components. Experimental results suggest that adding explainability components to a deep learning framework does not impact prediction performance and the explanations generated by the model can provide insights to the clinicians to understand the possible reasons behind patient mortality.