ROOct 4, 2022
Handling Sparse Rewards in Reinforcement Learning Using Model Predictive ControlMurad Dawood, Nils Dengler, Jorge de Heuvel et al.
Reinforcement learning (RL) has recently proven great success in various domains. Yet, the design of the reward function requires detailed domain expertise and tedious fine-tuning to ensure that agents are able to learn the desired behaviour. Using a sparse reward conveniently mitigates these challenges. However, the sparse reward represents a challenge on its own, often resulting in unsuccessful training of the agent. In this paper, we therefore address the sparse reward problem in RL. Our goal is to find an effective alternative to reward shaping, without using costly human demonstrations, that would also be applicable to a wide range of domains. Hence, we propose to use model predictive control~(MPC) as an experience source for training RL agents in sparse reward environments. Without the need for reward shaping, we successfully apply our approach in the field of mobile robot navigation both in simulation and real-world experiments with a Kuboki Turtlebot 2. We furthermore demonstrate great improvement over pure RL algorithms in terms of success rate as well as number of collisions and timeouts. Our experiments show that MPC as an experience source improves the agent's learning process for a given task in the case of sparse rewards.
ROOct 13, 2025
Constraint-Aware Reinforcement Learning via Adaptive Action ScalingMurad Dawood, Usama Ahmed Siddiquie, Shahram Khorshidi et al.
Safe reinforcement learning (RL) seeks to mitigate unsafe behaviors that arise from exploration during training by reducing constraint violations while maintaining task performance. Existing approaches typically rely on a single policy to jointly optimize reward and safety, which can cause instability due to conflicting objectives, or they use external safety filters that override actions and require prior system knowledge. In this paper, we propose a modular cost-aware regulator that scales the agent's actions based on predicted constraint violations, preserving exploration through smooth action modulation rather than overriding the policy. The regulator is trained to minimize constraint violations while avoiding degenerate suppression of actions. Our approach integrates seamlessly with off-policy RL methods such as SAC and TD3, and achieves state-of-the-art return-to-cost ratios on Safety Gym locomotion tasks with sparse costs, reducing constraint violations by up to 126 times while increasing returns by over an order of magnitude compared to prior methods.