Rob Geada

Rob Geada, Andrew Stephen McGough

Neural Architecture Search (NAS) algorithms are intended to remove the burden of manual neural network design, and have shown to be capable of designing excellent models for a variety of well-known problems. However, these algorithms require a variety of design parameters in the form of user configuration or hard-coded decisions which limit the variety of networks that can be discovered. This means that NAS algorithms do not eliminate model design tuning, they instead merely shift the burden of where that tuning needs to be applied. In this paper, we present SpiderNet, a hybrid differentiable-evolutionary and hardware-aware algorithm that rapidly and efficiently produces state-of-the-art networks. More importantly, SpiderNet is a proof-of-concept of a minimally-configured NAS algorithm; the majority of design choices seen in other algorithms are incorporated into SpiderNet's dynamically-evolving search space, minimizing the number of user choices to just two: reduction cell count and initial channel count. SpiderNet produces models highly-competitive with the state-of-the-art, and outperforms random search in accuracy, runtime, memory size, and parameter count.

Rob Geada, David Towers, Matthew Forshaw et al.

The boundless possibility of neural networks which can be used to solve a problem -- each with different performance -- leads to a situation where a Deep Learning expert is required to identify the best neural network. This goes against the hope of removing the need for experts. Neural Architecture Search (NAS) offers a solution to this by automatically identifying the best architecture. However, to date, NAS work has focused on a small set of datasets which we argue are not representative of real-world problems. We introduce eight new datasets created for a series of NAS Challenges: AddNIST, Language, MultNIST, CIFARTile, Gutenberg, Isabella, GeoClassing, and Chesseract. These datasets and challenges are developed to direct attention to issues in NAS development and to encourage authors to consider how their models will perform on datasets unknown to them at development time. We present experimentation using standard Deep Learning methods as well as the best results from challenge participants.

Rob Geada, Tommaso Teofili, Rui Vieira et al.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming increasingly more popular and can be found in workplaces and homes around the world. The decisions made by such "black box" systems are often opaque; that is, so complex as to be functionally impossible to understand. How do we ensure that these systems are behaving as desired? TrustyAI is an initiative which looks into explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) solutions to address this issue of explainability in the context of both AI models and decision services. This paper presents the TrustyAI Explainability Toolkit, a Java and Python library that provides XAI explanations of decision services and predictive models for both enterprise and data science use-cases. We describe the TrustyAI implementations and extensions to techniques such as LIME, SHAP and counterfactuals, which are benchmarked against existing implementations in a variety of experiments.

Rob Geada, Dennis Prangle, Andrew Stephen McGough

One-shot Neural Architecture Search (NAS) aims to minimize the computational expense of discovering state-of-the-art models. However, in the past year attention has been drawn to the comparable performance of naive random search across the same search spaces used by leading NAS algorithms. To address this, we explore the effects of drastically relaxing the NAS search space, and we present Bonsai-Net, an efficient one-shot NAS method to explore our relaxed search space. Bonsai-Net is built around a modified differential pruner and can consistently discover state-of-the-art architectures that are significantly better than random search with fewer parameters than other state-of-the-art methods. Additionally, Bonsai-Net performs simultaneous model search and training, dramatically reducing the total time it takes to generate fully-trained models from scratch.