Jazmin Collins

Jazmin Collins, Kaylah Myranda Nicholson, Yusuf Khadir et al.

The rapid growth of virtual reality (VR) has led to increased use of social VR platforms for interaction. However, these platforms lack adequate features to support blind and low vision (BLV) users, posing significant challenges in navigation, visual interpretation, and social interaction. One promising approach to these challenges is employing human guides in VR. However, this approach faces limitations with a lack of availability of humans to serve as guides, or the inability to customize the guidance a user receives from the human guide. We introduce an AI-powered guide to address these limitations. The AI guide features six personas, each offering unique behaviors and appearances to meet diverse user needs, along with visual interpretation and navigation assistance. We aim to use this AI guide in the future to help us understand BLV users' preferences for guide forms and functionalities.

Jazmin Collins, Sharon Y Lin, Tianqi Liu et al.

As social virtual reality (VR) grows more popular, addressing accessibility for blind and low vision (BLV) users is increasingly critical. Researchers have proposed an AI "sighted guide" to help users navigate VR and answer their questions, but it has not been studied with users. To address this gap, we developed a large language model (LLM)-powered guide and studied its use with 16 BLV participants in virtual environments with confederates posing as other users. We found that when alone, participants treated the guide as a tool, but treated it companionably around others, giving it nicknames, rationalizing its mistakes with its appearance, and encouraging confederate-guide interaction. Our work furthers understanding of guides as a versatile method for VR accessibility and presents design recommendations for future guides.

Jazmin Collins, Prasanthi Gurumurthy, Eric J. Gonzalez et al.

The gaze-and-pinch framework offers a high-fidelity interaction modality for spatial computing in virtual reality (VR), yet it remains vulnerable to coordination errors--timing misalignments between gaze fixation and pinch gestures. These errors are categorized into two types: late triggers (gaze leaves a target before pinch) and early triggers (pinch before gaze arrival on target). While late triggers are well-studied, early triggers lack robust solutions. We investigate two heuristics--STICKY selection (temporal buffer) and MAGNETIC selection (spatial field)--to mitigate these errors. A within-subjects study (N = 9) on the Samsung Galaxy XR evaluated these heuristics against a baseline. Findings indicate that while throughput and selection time remained stable, the heuristics fundamentally shifted user behavior and significantly reduced errors during selection. Notably, MAGNETIC selection induced an "offloading" effect where users traded precision for speed. Additionally, the heuristics reclassified ambiguous failures as explainable coordination errors. We provide recommendations for selection heuristics that enhance interaction speed and cognitive agency in virtual reality.

Ricardo Gonzalez, Jazmin Collins, Shiri Azenkot et al.

"Scene description" applications that describe visual content in a photo are useful daily tools for blind and low vision (BLV) people. Researchers have studied their use, but they have only explored those that leverage remote sighted assistants; little is known about applications that use AI to generate their descriptions. Thus, to investigate their use cases, we conducted a two-week diary study where 16 BLV participants used an AI-powered scene description application we designed. Through their diary entries and follow-up interviews, users shared their information goals and assessments of the visual descriptions they received. We analyzed the entries and found frequent use cases, such as identifying visual features of known objects, and surprising ones, such as avoiding contact with dangerous objects. We also found users scored the descriptions relatively low on average, 2.76 out of 5 (SD=1.49) for satisfaction and 2.43 out of 4 (SD=1.16) for trust, showing that descriptions still need significant improvements to deliver satisfying and trustworthy experiences. We discuss future opportunities for AI as it becomes a more powerful accessibility tool for BLV users.